Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
1
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by MrRom92 -
You use gcc with tunings 'haswell'. Can you please build one with tunings 'zenv3' if you find some time?
I really wonder what the tunings do these days on my Ryzen.
Here's a fresh compile with 'znver3' tuning.

Thank you for this! I’m not sure I truly understand the technical details behind it but if I have the gist of it correct, this build would be somehow optimized for Zen 3 CPUs eg. 5950X?
2
General - (fb2k) / Re: keeping 32 and 64 bit versions installed at the same time. will they conflict?
Last post by radorn -
@grimes
Again, I understand that, but that's different from what I'm asking.
I could even just copy the 32bit profile over to the 64bit "portable" installation to have all/most of my settings there and let it do whatever with it without worrying about the current installation.
And yet, that's still not what I'm asking.

I'm not asking for a solution, but for information about what would happen doing that.
6
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.0 (Release)
Last post by Porcus -
FLAC 1.4.1 is out.
God damn it, now we have to test it all over again :)
Changes aren't that much. Mainly, the help files were wrong - so flac --help and --explain showed old obsolete information. According to https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,123014.msg1016154.html#msg1016154 , "Binary might be an unmeasurable tiny amount faster because the binary is slightly smaller."

So I guess performance tests on official 1.4.0 are still valid. But, people are pumping out new compiles faster than they can be tested.
And faster than the damn overzealous antivirus engines can get their act together. I got a ton of them new builds blocked.
8
General - (fb2k) / keeping 32 and 64 bit versions installed at the same time. will they conflict?
Last post by radorn -
--------------accidentally posted here when it should be in the foobar2000 section---------------------

I've already installed v2.0 beta on top of the old v1.6.x stable, and have seen the copied profile folder. But how about having both 64bit and 32bit versions installed? How well will that work? Should I expect breakage? My worry is mainly about having them fighting over settings and one or both acting out because of that.
Is the new scheme designed so that both versions can coexist or do I have pick one and stick to it?
I'm kind of concerned about components I use, particularly rare input ones, even from outside the repository, so I'm not yet ready to do away with the 32bit version and switch over to 64. I would like to use both.