Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
The component can do a great many things without a UI. In Columns UI, you can hide panels so that's easy enough...
I understand much better, I am satisfied with my findings and will proceed with a few example projects in the coming week, thank you for explaining to me all of this, especially the last part.
3. Yes, most likely it overwrites tags, since they have to be updated with every play. However you should be able to import tags to database first, on the right-click tracks > Playback Statistics menu. Then your tag ratings would also be in the database and get written back to tags. (Test it first on one track to be safe)
Apologies, I wasn't clear. I meant to ask if this will replace all of my existing ratings with nothing when I select Automatically Synchronize File Tags. Meaning, will all of the ratings I already added be replaced with an empty value?
Last post by Kraeved -
There is something wrong about Lancer mod 2021-05-11 hosted on RareWares. It is unable to correctly encode WAV when its sampling rate is less or equal to 11025 Hz: SSE2 version outputs silence, SSE3 outputs heavily distorted sound. All other Vorbis encoders (original, Aotuv, Venc aka Aotuv 2021-03-20, FFMPEG's libvorbis) do the job as expected.
P.S. Also, Lancer mod section on the website is missing its own anchor, <a name="oggenc-aotuv"> is used instead.
General Complete name : in.wav Format : Wave Format settings : PcmWaveformat File size : 361 KiB Duration : 16 s 780 ms Overall bit rate mode : Constant Overall bit rate : 176 kb/s
Audio Format : PCM Format settings : Little / Signed Codec ID : 1 Duration : 16 s 780 ms Bit rate mode : Constant Bit rate : 176.4 kb/s Channel(s) : 1 channel Sampling rate : 11.025 kHz Bit depth : 16 bits Stream size : 361 KiB (100%)
Last post by fbuser -
Ok, now the problem is clear. There is no row having he value "composers (67)" in BadFieldTable. With the following query and batch it should work:
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS BadFieldTable; CREATE TABLE BadFieldTable AS WITH BadFields AS ( SELECT composers, composersort, composersortorder, conductor, album, discnumber, tracknumber, path, subsong FROM MediaLibrary WHERE coalesce(composers, composersort, composersortorder, conductor) IS NOT NULL ) SELECT fieldname || ' (' || count(fieldname) OVER(PARTITION BY fieldname) || ')' Node1, * FROM ( SELECT 'composers' fieldname, * FROM BadFields WHERE composers IS NOT NULL UNION ALL SELECT 'composersort', * FROM BadFields WHERE composersort IS NOT NULL UNION ALL SELECT 'composersortorder', * FROM BadFields WHERE composersortorder IS NOT NULL UNION ALL SELECT 'conductor', * FROM BadFields WHERE conductor IS NOT NULL );
Last post by TF3RDL -
Feature request for Peakmeter part (and to the extent, spectrum/spectrogram visualization): A feature to display Mid/Side representations of all stereo/surround pairs like this
This can be useful for letting me know if the particular song have phase-related/mono-compatibility issues, even though foobar2000 is not a DAW obviously
Last post by koupa -
The ability to change between playlist sidebar and album list. I use F2K "for ever" in windows and now it seems another program. Almost crippled.
Last post by file627 -
I have most of the "test" CDs after about 1990, including the Stereophile's, Chesky, both Sheffield/XLO, etc. I don't have CD-CHECK (tm). But, honestly, most of the ones that came out after ~1988 are worthless for techs. For example, that Philips Audio Signals Disc 1 – SBC 429 , has a whopping 99 tracks. This and other Philips test CDs were put out by one of the formats' developers. It comes right out of the R&D dept. Not sure Sony put out their own suite other than YEDS (which is on Archive). Denon may have, as one you noted above:
One critical, must-have track, as was often reported on in Measurements section of reviews, of Stereo Review, Audio and even Stereophile (for a while), was/is/remains the SQUARE WAVE test. It's importance (in audio) is controversial, to say the least. But it is very weird and interesting how folks go out of their way to discredit it -- especially when it comes to is application in digital audio:
In my filter I have low frequencies displayed in high resolution just fine, it have nothing to do with links you provided above.
Do you mean showcwt or something else? And as I said before, you can't have precise time resolution while having higher resolution on lower frequencies at the same time
Irrelevant, showcwt have high resolution of low frequencies.