Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Bitrate estimates for the upcoming 128 kbps test (Read 29431 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bitrate estimates for the upcoming 128 kbps test

Reply #25
My table is updated:
http://foobar2000.net/divers/temp/128_bitrate_classical.xls

Simple txt file:
http://foobar2000.net/divers/temp/128.txt

WMA_VBR50 is not suitable for ~130 kbps encoding with classical music. The average bitrate I get is 89,66 kbps! Two files only (on 150) are over the 120 kbps line.


NB: I verified all other encodings. There are not other mistakes in the table.

Bitrate estimates for the upcoming 128 kbps test

Reply #26
Alright I'm not going to make a bitrate table, because it would be a huge table (4260 tracks).  The mean average bitrate for Nero 4.2.1.0 Internet Profile High Quality is 132kbps.

Bitrate estimates for the upcoming 128 kbps test

Reply #27
I updated my bitrate table with additional encoders / settings:

Monkey's Audio  normal
Vorbis AoTuV beta 4.51  q4  &  q4.25
Lame 3.97b1  -V5  &  -V5 --vbr-new
Lame 3.98a2  -V5 --vbr-new --athaa-sensitivity 1
iTunes 6 / QT 7.03  AAC VBR 128 kbps
WMA 9.1 Standard  q50  &  q75  &  VBR 2-pass 128 kbps
Nero 7  AAC VBR "Internet"





The Excel table is available here: OLD LINK REMOVED



EDIT

Updated table: bitrates_public2.xls, includes a new graphic.[/s]

(The pictures on this post are from still from the old table.)

EDIT 2

OLD LINK REMOVED