1
Notice
Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
2
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_quicksearch
Last post by marc2k3 -https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,125362.0.html
And Default UI does not allow 3rd party toolbars.
3
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_quicksearch
Last post by ASopH -thx a lot for this :-)
2 little bugs found: 1) after open and close: pointed (with mouse/keys) items in a fat font
2) properties are not in dark mode
and a little request: is it possible to place quicksearch in toolbar?
4
Other Lossy Codecs / Re: TSAC: Very Low Bitrate Audio Compression
Last post by forart.eu -EDIT:
What about a NN-based audio codecs blind comparison ?
I've collected some here.
5
Site Related Discussion / Re: Please remove my account
Last post by korth -6
Site Related Discussion / Re: Please remove my account
Last post by soundping -https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/11/eu-right-to-be-forgotten-online-data/
7
Support - (fb2k) / Re: Foobar2000 v2.* playback sound quality lower than v1.X
Last post by fooball -But even then, we have no ability to verify the configuration of each test subject, which might not be like for like. Once we've had an opportunity to review and verify the ABX, we also then have to be able to reproduce the samples.
(When I say "we", I don't mean "me"!)
8
Site Related Discussion / Re: Please remove my account
Last post by fooball -9
Support - (fb2k) / Re: Foobar2000 v2.* playback sound quality lower than v1.X
Last post by Porcus -Arguably you should set up three, and always play from "number zero" in between, so that test subject cannot guess from the time it takes to start playback whether it was the same as the previous.
Rinse and repeat a pre-determined number of times. Count up the correct answers. Report here.
That could have been done a long time ago.
And then one could maybe have taken it serious. But not anymore. Someone who has already made up their mind to this degree, why shouldn't they bother to do the test they have so much aversion against, when they can just make up numbers that support their desired conclusion and post those instead?
10
Support - (fb2k) / Re: Foobar2000 v2.* playback sound quality lower than v1.X
Last post by ojdo -[...] lack of tangible proof does not mean that hypothesis is falseAgreed, but it does not free you from having to bring tangible evidence for your claim as per ToS and a basic "burden of proof" gate. We are basically in a dragon in my garage situation. Without anything to go by, all we can do is ignore the claim. Or never stop looking for all those dragons out there.