1
Notice
Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
2
General Audio / Re: Live stream format with proper metadata & embededd album covers
Last post by userPaul -3
General Audio / Re: Live stream format with proper metadata & embededd album covers
Last post by Peter -Know any examples of such already in circulation?
Unfortunately Matroska support isn't that common among audio players, hardware or software, getting others to support it might be hard.
4
WavPack / Re: WavPack and DSD 128+
Last post by Bogozo -BTW, it also reports bits_per_sample=8 for DSD in dff and dsf containers, when using -show_streams.
Spoiler (click to show/hide)
5
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: ReplayGain DSP - Alternative ReplayGain implementation by Case
Last post by Mekoz -I play songs in shuffle mode. All my songs have replaygain info, i use truepeak scanner.
6
WavPack / Re: WavPack and DSD 128+
Last post by bryant -from where it picks up 8-bit part?I don't know. Here's what FFprobe displays for the DSD file in the WavPack test suite:
Code: [Select]
david@pop-os-hp15:~/Projects/FFmpeg$ ./ffprobe ~/Downloads/test_suite/bit_depths/1bit_dsd.wvBut if you use FFmpeg to convert to WAV you get 16-bit PCM and if you convert to WavPack you get 32-bit float PCM (which both seem reasonable).
ffprobe version N-114844-g376b3d53c5 Copyright (c) 2007-2024 the FFmpeg developers
built with gcc 11 (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04)
configuration: --disable-sndio --enable-static --enable-nonfree --enable-gpl --enable-openssl
libavutil 59. 15.100 / 59. 15.100
libavcodec 61. 5.103 / 61. 5.103
libavformat 61. 3.100 / 61. 3.100
libavdevice 61. 2.100 / 61. 2.100
libavfilter 10. 2.101 / 10. 2.101
libswscale 8. 2.100 / 8. 2.100
libswresample 5. 2.100 / 5. 2.100
libpostproc 58. 2.100 / 58. 2.100
Input #0, wv, from '/home/david/Downloads/test_suite/bit_depths/1bit_dsd.wv':
Metadata:
Artist : Lorna Hunt
Title : Long Hard Road (excerpt)
Album : All in One Day
Track : 1
Year : 1999
Duration: 00:00:30.00, start: 0.000000, bitrate: 2553 kb/s
Stream #0:0: Audio: wavpack, 352800 Hz, stereo, fltp (8 bit)
7
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: ReplayGain DSP - Alternative ReplayGain implementation by Case
Last post by Case -I'm assuming you use the "Apply most suitable gain" option and a non-random playback order - please correct me if assumptions are wrong.
The foobar2000 console will report which ReplayGain mode is in use, for example for album mode you'll see a line like "ReplayGain DSP in album mode".
If the effective mode is determined incorrectly and it uses wrong gain source, it could very well cause wrong loudness. If that's the case I'd like to see the tags of the problem track, the previous track in playlist, and the next track in playlist.
Or possibly if gain values are missing and you rely on the automatic scanning, it may not be able to do a good job if it runs out of time due to performance reasons. Details about the automatic scanning will be reported on the console too.
8
WavPack / Re: WavPack and DSD 128+
Last post by mycroft -9
WavPack / Re: WavPack and DSD 128+
Last post by bryant -But the actual output of FFmpeg is correctly decimated 8x and it can also do the properly filtered downsampling to reasonable rates. Perhaps just telling Plex to downsample to a lower rate would do it?
10
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_vis_goom
Last post by dreampillet -I use 32bit foobar and I have a lot of components so I wondered if that was part of the issue, so I tried using a portable x64 installation without any other components installed but the same kept on happening. I'm on Windows 10 and admittedly my CPU isn't the most powerful. Something similar happened to me with your MilkDrop component at first before tweaking some settings. I don't know if it may just be a problem on my end or if it may just be the Windows version.
Either way, this is a cool project. I had never heard of goom before. Props for taking such an interesting challenge for fun!