1
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_enhanced_spectrum_analyzer
Last post by Crossover -This plugin looks nice in my foobar2000.Thanks!
This plugin looks nice in my foobar2000.Thanks!
Feature request: Show more details on higher frequencies with "Low detail mode" switch, something like this:Yes, smoothing will be part of the new version:
With LDM off:
[attach type=image]30421[/attach]
With LDM on:
[attach type=image]30419[/attach]
Please check input and output (compressed as FLAC, because it fits within the 30 MB of files per post limit for the forum). ABX them, and listen them carefully. Post the results when done!
foo_abx 2.2.1 reportDuring the first second the input sounds more metallic. The codec simplified the output. But I don't think this kind of thing is even meant to be transparent. Just a tech demo to squish things slowly into tiny space, modern day VQF.
foobar2000 v2.2 preview 2024-05-01
2024-05-06 17:12:22
File A: input.flac
SHA1: bd824f975ffb8eaa36eedef18a8fba79dc40eb39
File B: output_q5.flac
SHA1: 5b197642f52a03d74215a21597c93cc826a93b37
Output:
XAudio2 : Default Sound Device
Crossfading: NO
17:12:22 : Test started.
17:15:03 : Test restarted.
17:15:03 : 01/01
17:15:08 : Test restarted.
17:15:08 : 02/02
17:15:15 : Test restarted.
17:15:15 : 03/03
17:15:22 : Test restarted.
17:15:22 : 04/04
17:15:28 : Test restarted.
17:15:28 : 05/05
17:15:33 : Test restarted.
17:15:33 : 06/06
17:15:38 : Test restarted.
17:15:38 : 07/07
17:15:43 : Test restarted.
17:15:43 : 08/08
17:15:43 : Test finished.
----------
Total: 8/8
p-value: 0.0039 (0.39%)
-- signature --
22abf4db7b1e2113f428dde825de5fe41b6c6325
The recordings have good quality, but using just my ears I've got a hard time to tell them apart (i.e. Foobar v1 vs Foobar v2).A note: you can load both tracks into fb2k (either v1 or v2), select both, right click, Utilities > ABX tracks and you can do a ABX blind test to see if you can actually tell the difference between the two tracks. Please consider doing this and posting your ABX results!
I am conducting the listening test of the TSAC, and comparison is possible.
Sorry about the bug, I didn't take the same track repeating into account at all. The first version didn't need any special handling for any situation as its logic was super simple.No sweat, continual use has seen no errors so far, you've done it mate!!
New version has been uploaded that outsources time tracking to a separate thread, track switch time should now be accurate to 10 milliseconds, assuming all components report latency correctly.
The component will now detect if it's the same track we are playing and won't seek to the last recorded timestamp, fixes for example the repeat track play mode.
If the timestamp is beyond the current track's duration the component will start the track from the beginning. Previous versions seeked past the end skipping the track entirely.