Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: SOX plugin interface (Read 1908 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SOX plugin interface

Hi all
I am using the SOX plugin to resample. I noticed that the interface to set the parameters for the plugin only has a limited set of parameters

For example:

Interface choices for quality are "normal" or "best"
According to the SOC documentation SOX has "low" "quick" "medium" "high" "very high"

Phase response in SOX can be configures 0-100%, the interface only gives 0-50%
The "-a" (aliasing) option does not appear in the interface
Dithering is not available in the interface

I am aware that the interface has all the necessary parameters for 99% of the use cases, but it would be nice to have all the possibilities in case they are needed.
Would it be possible to expand the interface panel?
Thanks a lot


SOX plugin interface

Reply #1
Interface choices for quality are "normal" or "best"
According to the SOC documentation SOX has "low" "quick" "medium" "high" "very high"

"Low" and "quick" are of too low quality; "medium" is also useless IMHO.
"Normal" is roughly equal to "high", "best" to "very high".

Phase response in SOX can be configures 0-100%, the interface only gives 0-50%

There's no reason to maximize pre-ringing, so this plugin doesn't have such option.

The "-a" (aliasing) option does not appear in the interface

"Allow aliasing/imaging" checkbox.

Dithering is not available in the interface

Dithering should be done after all DSP plugins, so there's no point to do it in this plugin.

Would it be possible to expand the interface panel?

Not planned.

SOX plugin interface

Reply #2
Thanks, lvqcl
That clarifies things and I rest my case.