Lowpass, too much lower
Reply #16 – 2005-08-21 20:18:57
I have a similar requirement of higher lowpass filter. I shall elaborate. When I rip a CD to my HDD I use vorbis at -q 7. Now, ABXing suggests that this is pointless because -q 5 is already transparent to me. But I choose -q 7 anyway because it isn't just me that will be listening to the compressed music. Plus, I'm a bit of a perfectionist and even though I cannot tell the difference I still prefer the high frequencies to be left there as much as possible. Using a spectral analyser I can see a big difference (lowpass frequency) between -q 5 and -q 7. This difference is what justifies the extra bandwidth. Basically, I don't rely soley on ABX testing to determine better compression ratios. [a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=321554"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a] What's the point if you can't hear the difference? I don't understand. If you want everything to be there and don't care about the space (it seems like you don't care since you use -q7 over -q5 even being unable to tell the difference) why don't you use lossless? It is the only way to be sure you don't miss anything, but for casual/portable listening is way too much IMO of course. Moving the lowpass up in perceptual codecs is not that simple. It would bloat the bitrate and quality for mid/low frequencies would probably go down, but I'll let someone more savvy elaborate on that. edit: added quote [a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=321558"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a] Because I'm not the only one that will be listening to the compressed songs. When -q 5 was my standard there would occasionally be complaints. The small increase in bitrate was all that was needed. Lossy is still too much, since resulting files are over four times bigger than the ogg files. I didn't claim to feel or hear the difference, infact I said otherwise.