Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: CueRipper vs EAC : Any difference? (Read 5195 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

CueRipper vs EAC : Any difference?

Long time EAC user , just happened to find CueRipper in my cuetools folder. As far as i can see , it generates the same log tables like EAC. It also has a secure ripping mode like EAC , however the ripping process took a lot less time when compared to EAC (which is usually long)

Is there any stark difference between EAC 1.0 prebeta 2 and CueRipper (which came with cuetools) apart from the ripping time?


looking for some insight into this! Thanks!
 

CueRipper vs EAC : Any difference?

Reply #1 –
They do seem to be pretty similar tools. There's a comparison page here: http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?ti...n_of_CD_rippers. Based on that chart, it appears that they have the same functionality except that with C2 error detection, EAC uses it only once while CueRipper uses it on rereads as well, CueRipper can check across different pressings for AccurateRip while EAC can't, and EAC has a wider selection of metadata and album art.