Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.

Poll

What lossy or semi-lossy format do you use on a *common* basis?

MP3 (*.mp3)
[ 22 ] (23.2%)
AAC-LC/HE-AAC/HE-AACv2/xHE-AAC (*.m4a, *.aac, ...)
[ 27 ] (28.4%)
LossyWAV + a lossless format (*.lossy.flac, *.lossy.lpac, *.lossy.wv, ...)
[ 3 ] (3.2%)
FSLAC (*.flac)
[ 2 ] (2.1%)
Windows Media Audio (*.wma)
[ 0 ] (0%)
TwinVQ (*.vqf)
[ 0 ] (0%)
Ogg Vorbis (*.ogg)
[ 5 ] (5.3%)
Opus (*.opus)
[ 22 ] (23.2%)
Encodec (*.ecdc)
[ 0 ] (0%)
TSAC (*.tsac)
[ 0 ] (0%)
Musepack (*.mpc)
[ 8 ] (8.4%)
MP2 (*.mp2)
[ 0 ] (0%)
MP1 (*.mp1)
[ 0 ] (0%)
SBC (*.sbc)
[ 0 ] (0%)
Speex (*.spx)
[ 0 ] (0%)
IMA ADPCM/Microsoft ADPCM (*.wav)
[ 0 ] (0%)
Quite OK Audio (QOA) (*.qoa)
[ 0 ] (0%)
AC3 (*.ac3)
[ 3 ] (3.2%)
AMR (narrow-band/wide-band) (*.amr, *.awb)
[ 0 ] (0%)
Real Audio Cook (*.ra)
[ 0 ] (0%)
WavPack Lossy (*.wv)
[ 2 ] (2.1%)
I don't encode or listen to lossy or semi-lossy audio on a common basis.
[ 1 ] (1.1%)

Total Members Voted: 46

Voting closes: 2024-12-31 23:39:35

Topic: 2024 Format Poll [Lossy/Semi-Lossy] (Read 924 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

2024 Format Poll [Lossy/Semi-Lossy]

My second poll, thank you!  :)

This is a lossy/semi-lossy format poll.  ;D  ;D

Remember: FSLAC, IMA ADPCM, Microsoft ADPCM, Quite OK Audio (QOA) and LossyWAV are so called semi-lossy formats and not truly lossy. They only use quantization and not other methods to compress audio.  :P

Also remember: TSAC and Encodec are neural audio formats.  8)

Vote as fast as you can! :D

There are so many formats, which a part of them, people use rarely.  ::)

Re: 2024 Format Poll [Lossy/Semi-Lossy]

Reply #1
Is it intentional that one can select only a single option? I'd rather pick up to N options.



Re: 2024 Format Poll [Lossy/Semi-Lossy]

Reply #4
WAV is not lossy.
In and of itself, no, however whether the audio data contained in a WAV container is a lossless copy of the original or whether it has been processed is another matter entirely.
lossyWAV -q X -a 4 -s h -A --feedback 2 --limit 15848 --scale 0.5 | FLAC -5 -e -p -b 512 -P=4096 -S- (having set foobar to output 24-bit PCM; scaling by 0.5 gives the ANS headroom to work)

Re: 2024 Format Poll [Lossy/Semi-Lossy]

Reply #5
WavPack is missing. You should add it.
You should also remove VQF, Real Audio, SBC, Encodec, MP1 and MP2: they are nonsensical in 2024. If you really need to offer an exhaustive overview of vintage formats, check https://www.rarewares.org/rrw/programs.php and give to Mafuka a chance ;)
xHE-AAC is different from AAC (LC and HE), I would make a different entry for it.


EDIT: I would also remove WMA: 0 vote in 2016
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,112400.0.html

EDIT2: there's already a 2024 lossy poll:
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,125552.0.html
Wavpack Hybrid: one encoder for all scenarios
WavPack -c4.5hx6 (44100Hz & 48000Hz) ≈ 390 kbps + correction file
WavPack -c4hx6 (96000Hz) ≈ 768 kbps + correction file
WavPack -h (SACD & DSD) ≈ 2400 kbps at 2.8224 MHz

Re: 2024 Format Poll [Lossy/Semi-Lossy]

Reply #6
* Lumping xHE-AAC/USAC with older AAC formats is not useful. USAC's story is separate even platform/decoder support wise.

* "use" is ambiguous.
  * Does consuming content with a codec considered use?
  * If yes, then we all probably consume (E-)AC3. And MP2 is quite alive in broadcast too, making @guruboolez objection to its inclusion off the mark.
  * IMHO, defining "use" as "encoding to" would be more useful, either here or in a separate poll.


 

Re: 2024 Format Poll [Lossy/Semi-Lossy]

Reply #8
Remember: FSLAC, IMA ADPCM, Microsoft ADPCM, Quite OK Audio (QOA) and LossyWAV are so called semi-lossy formats and not truly lossy. They only use quantization and not other methods to compress audio.  :P
Also WavPack Lossy is still a semi-lossy format (I call it as a lossy format that only use quantization). :P