1
Other Lossy Codecs / LossyFlac vs Opus 256
Last post by 2FlacShakur -Long time lurker first time poster.
I have 2 hard drives full with flac files from my CD collection, i would like to listen to some of these on the go on my ipod (rockbox) but i'm a little conflicted regarding which format to use.
On some samples with my PHILIPS Fidelio X2HR headphones, although entry level headphones, i feel like i'm able to hear small differences in background drums / cymbals on some tracks all the way up to Opus 256kbps. I know that even Xiph state that 128kbps should be transparent but it doesn't feel that way to me (is it psychological?).
I would like to have the best quality with all the background parts of the song easy to hear as per the flacs but i would also like a compromise in size vs quality.
This has lead me to consider LossyFlac (extraportable) which i won't claim to fully understand how the loss in quality for the bitrate happens as the Spek shows it to look identical to the untouched flac, or Opus at 256kbps.
My question is as both these options render a similar file size which would give the best transparent sounding files?
I know that Opus uses high pass filtering where as the flacs bit depth is altered with LossyWAV>Flac .
So far with ABX tests it seems both are identical to my ears so which one would be closer to the original flac?.
Any other suggestion welcomed also, I've heard but never used xHE-AAC or WavPack are these good alternatives?
also is there a nice quick way to convert LossyWav to ALAC instead of flac?