Skip to main content
Recent Posts
General Audio / Re: Strange frequency spike near 18kHz in song
Last post by rutra80 -
If that's in hihat, it may be sample-based, and the sample could be recorded in times when CRT-monitors were in use and they often had ~16kHz vertical refresh rate affecting the recordings. That sample if transposed up a lil would also transpose up the recorded CRT interference to ~18kHz.
Or if that hihat is procedural/synth-based, the algorithms may happen to generate top content at that frequency.
General - (fb2k) / Re: File Renaming On Conversion
Last post by anamorphic -
What, you think foobar is tricking you? ;)

Yes, using metadata field names anywhere in foobar will always show up as such (although now you are replacing the brackets so they will not match exactly). Except for characters that cannot be used in filenames, like a '?' that gets renamed to a '-' instead.

Another way you could test the tracks is with a right-click > File Operations > Rename, and using the same converter string. It should have nothing to do if everything matches.
General - (fb2k) / Re: File Renaming On Conversion
Last post by Fletchesus -
Think I have it figured out - Properties > Tools > Automatically Fill Values > Source > Other > add string $caps($replace(%title%,'(','[',')',']')%) > Pattern %title%

Unless there is an easier way.

Thanks again.
General - (fb2k) / Re: File Renaming On Conversion
Last post by Fletchesus -
One follow up question - is there an easy way to ensure that the renamed files are reflected as the metadata file names, or must one take the extra step to use a program such as Mp3tag to ensure that the filename as converted > metadata file name. Cannot see an easy step in Foobar conversion process to do so.

Many thanks again.

The extent it helps current string is: $caps(%album artist% - $replace(%album%,'(','[',')',']')/%tracknumber% $replace(%title%,'(','[',')',']')%)
General - (fb2k) / Re: Linux Port
Last post by Rollin -
While the majority of Linux users are IT professionals/enthusiasts.
And in most cases gaining that Linux user base - results in a quiite a bit boost in IT professionals, good bug-reporting and descriptive/thoughtful feature ideas, for a closed source project.
If they are such IT professionals, then why should they wait while someone create player for them?
Lossless / Other Codecs / Re: Quick question about Lossless/Studio Monitors
Last post by greynol -
At higher bitrates, lossy artifacts from a well tuned codec are almost never identified as spatial/directional, regardless of the grade of gear let alone headphones vs. speakers, etc.  Even at lower bitrates, non-spatial artifacts are still going to be more noticeable than spatial artifacts.
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2018