1
Notice
Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
2
Ogg Vorbis - Tech / Re: Vorbis 1.3.7 aoTuV and Lancer patches
Last post by john33 -Code: [Select]
Unrecoverable playback error: Unsupported stream format: 11025 Hz / 24-bit / 1 channels (0x4)Yet, if I look at the Properties in foobar, it specifies 16 bit! I can encode the flac file with any of the oggenc2 variants (Windows 10 Pro x64) and the same situation exists - same error message, but properties appear correct. Decoding the flac to wav doesn't help either. Any ideas, anyone?
3
MP3 - General / Re: Resurrecting/Preserving the Helix MP3 encoder
Last post by KevinB52379 -When I try @Case version he kindly uploaded for me, it encodes at about 1,000x real time, where as your version encodes about 250x and slower (with the system slow down and hangs).
I tried both the regular x64 version and the fast math x64 version, same results...
I'm really not sure what the issue is.
4
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_vis_spectrum_analyzer
Last post by wojak -Since we now have the ability to see "RMS" as text maybe it would be useful to also see "Peaks" as text. And to go further also "Peaks - RMS" - but what would that value be "equivalent" (sort of) of: momentary/short term DR (from the infamous plugin), momentary/short term PLR/PSR, momentary/short term LUFS, momentary/short term LRA or something else?
Isn't that already available in the modern Loudness Peakmeter plugin?
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,123953.msg1027603.html#msg1027603
It is there but Peak Meter (from vis...plugin) comsumes less power and is smaller on the screen and does not require the whole drawing of those readings.
Istead what we already have is graphic Peak (which I started to use instead of a built-in one), graphic RMS (which is VU meter if I understood your earlier discussion properly), text RMS (inside the graphic RMS) so I thought that it should be easy to also display the text version of Peak inside the graph (let's say beside the text RMS values). And if we have those two it should be easy to display the difference between them (but because I am not an expert I am not shure what value would it represent (LUFS/PLR (or rather PSR)/LRS/DR or something different). Just a suggestion - we would not have to use two components but one.
@pqyt - as for specs and documentation - I am sorry but someone with more knowledge that I have should help here. All Iknow comes from Wiki and other such places.
5
FLAC / MOVED: FLAC - stored main chunk length differs from written length
Last post by korth -6
General - (fb2k) / Re: Bypass (Confirm File Removal) when deleting a file
Last post by angang -Seems like prompt window can only be disabled if option "Send files at recycle bin if possible" is checked at "Deletion type" and prompt option unchecked.It is ok in 2.1.4 version but the problem persists in 2.2 beta version.
7
MP3 / Re: Low bitrate MP3 (+ unsupported bitrates)
Last post by Klymins -8
MP3 - General / Re: Resurrecting/Preserving the Helix MP3 encoder
Last post by Wombat -One simple and one with fast-math + AVX2 that doesn't do much for speed on my Ryzen 5900x.
You may give it a try.
9
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_vis_spectrum_analyzer
Last post by Defender -Since we now have the ability to see "RMS" as text maybe it would be useful to also see "Peaks" as text. And to go further also "Peaks - RMS" - but what would that value be "equivalent" (sort of) of: momentary/short term DR (from the infamous plugin), momentary/short term PLR/PSR, momentary/short term LUFS, momentary/short term LRA or something else?
Isn't that already available in the modern Loudness Peakmeter plugin?
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,123953.msg1027603.html#msg1027603
10
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_vis_spectrum_analyzer
Last post by Case -Sorry @case but I'm not going to take your word for it. Removing the division causes all the test files from SOS to have a dBFS reading that is 3dB higher than their expected result. Even the tone://997 reference is wrong.It's not my word, that's the very definition of RMS: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Root_mean_square#Definition.
You calculate the sum of values squared, divide by the number of values and take square root of that.
And removing the last division does not increase the result, I don't understand why you claim that. It causes the file labeled -20 dB to show -23 dB RMS, or -20 dB with the +3 mode enabled. And tone:// test is -3.0 dB / 0.0 dB.