Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Last post by Case -
New version released where the "positive gain" term is changed to "volume increase" as the option now takes both the gain and the target playback level amplifications into account.
There is now also advanced config setting at 'Preferences' -> 'Advanced' -> 'Playback' -> 'ReplayGain DSP' to control maximum allowed gain value with the realtime scanner. It now defaults to +20 dB, range is 0 to 100 dB.
And the peak compress clip prevention method was adjusted, it can now be enabled even for tracks that have unknown peaks (like Opus files with just tags).
Last post by Klymins - @danadam I did a search but I could not find this encoder anywhere, do you have an idea how can I find it or rip it from Adobe Media Encoder CS6 to use it's full capabilities?
Last post by redorb -
Hello! Is something broken with WilB Biography 1.4.2? New artist photos won't show up, if I download and add artist pictures manually all is OK. Wikipedia, allmusic, last.fm text works.
static double apply_filter(float* A, float* B, int num_taps) { int i = num_taps - 1; float sum = 0.0;
do { sum += A[0] * B[0] + A[i] * B[i] + A[1] * B[1] + A[i - 1] * B[i - 1]; A += 2; B += 2; } while ((i -= 4) > 0);
return sum; }
In MSVC, regardless of settings (AVX2 or not, fp:fast or fp:precise), it has similar speed as version 3 and similar quality as version 4, while version 3 has obviously lower quality and version 4 has obviously slower speed. However in mingw64 and -Ofast (AVX2 or not), version 5 is slower than version 4 albeit they have similar quality.
So MSVC benefits from having 4 items in the same line, mingw64 does the opposite.
Magenta and white are v3 showing lower quality, the others are v4 and v5 which are similar. Notice the two v3 results have 0.00001% THD and 0.00003% IMD+N. The figures are low, but still worse than v4 and v5.