Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn? (Read 8033 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #26
Quote
Some record label tape vaults changed policy regarding shipment of mastertapes.

I'm sure that record labels never shipped original tapes ! That's totally impossible.

Probably a copy from a CD   :))


Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #27
I'm sure that record labels never shipped original tapes ! That's totally impossible.

I have a hunch that "master tape" has been subject to definitions about as vague as "live album".

I also have a hunch that record companies' policy on the matter might have been revised after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_Universal_Studios_fire

Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #28
Quote from: biloute

Probably a copy from a CD   :))


What with the age of some those original tapes now at 50 - 60 years plus.
Might be better off mastering from a early 80's CD.


Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #30
Porcus posted a similar topic years ago, instead of vinyl, the scammers sold "true analog" copies on open reel tapes:
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,114203.0.html
Not sure if is was that thread, have not read it yet.
Be I vaguely remember someone saying on this forum a lightly played LP from the 50' & 60's could Now be better quality that old master tapes.

Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #31
Quote from: biloute

Probably a copy from a CD   :))


What with the age of some those original tapes now at 50 - 60 years plus.
Might be better off mastering from a early 80's CD.

The poor digitalization made in the early 80s on 12/14 bits from 1960s tapes must sound better than the same 60yo tapes by now.





Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #32
Not sure if is was that thread, have not read it yet.
Be I vaguely remember someone saying on this forum a lightly played LP from the 50' & 60's could Now be better quality that old master tapes.

Except "big names" I think 2/3 of the music production tapes since 1950 are gone forever. 
Many CD of soundtracks, obscure artists, are from vinyls.



Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #33
Edit
scammers sold "true analog" copies on open reel tapes:

Note, the release where I started the thread, was a novelty/merchandise thing. An edition of 17 which came with the CD - evidently the CD was meant to be played and the tape to stand in the bookshelf.

But in reply#14 - not from me - there was something "interesting": https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,114203.msg941916.html#msg941916
 https://tapeproject.com/why-tape/


Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #35
perfectly rational decision if your production chain was mostly digital / in the box to begin with (vis-a-vis analog gear) ...

Re: Mobile Fidelity's "analog" remasters - looks like we missed out on the popcorn?

Reply #36
Same people who rave about the "natural" vinyl sound of their SugarCube SC-1.

Wow! That thing is $2k. For one tenth that cost, you could get iZotope's RX-10 and probably do a better job.