HydrogenAudio

Lossy Audio Compression => Other Lossy Codecs => Topic started by: medo960 on 2021-06-15 04:09:03

Title: EAC3 vs AAC
Post by: medo960 on 2021-06-15 04:09:03
HELLO guys
i wonder which audio codec is better eac3 or aac in the same bitrate for stereo audio ?
Title: Re: EAC3 vs AAC
Post by: musicalman on 2021-06-18 20:38:53
I have no idea. Is there anything which can encode to EAC3?

Also which bit rates is EAC3 meant for, is it even near competitive at < 128 kbps?
Title: Re: EAC3 vs AAC
Post by: IgorC on 2021-06-18 21:49:47
EAC3 to AC3 is the same as AAC to HE-AAC.

If  an original source is EAC3 it's recommended to not transcode from lossy to lossy (from EAC3 to AAC).
If  an original source  is lossless then go with AAC(medium and high bitrates) or HE-AAC (less than ~180-200 kbps for 5.1) for better quality.
Title: Re: EAC3 vs AAC
Post by: j7n on 2021-06-19 05:03:07
E-AC-3 is only a slight improvement over conventional AC-3, and still carries an overhead of loudness, compression and checksum data. It requires a relatively high bitrate. AAC is more efficient and compatible on the personal computer. Maybe that is not true on h/w receivers.
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2021