Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
2
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: [fb2k v2] Playlist Attributes (foo_playlist_attributes)
Last post by marc2k3 -
I think it's an error. It looks like the component site is not showing a required version so the component updater has no idea.

https://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_playlist_attributes

Another one of fbuser's components really does list a requirement for fb2k 2.0....

https://www.foobar2000.org/components/view/foo_popup_panels

I guess that's something that needs updating on the playlist atrributes page.

edit: I manually installed it on my 1.6.17 install and it fails to load so don't update. :P

Code: [Select]
Failed to load DLL: foo_playlist_attributes.dll
Reason: Wrong version number; this component appears to have been built with a newer version of the foobar2000 SDK, please download latest version of foobar2000 in order to use it.
6
Audio Hardware / Re: audio device on Beelink u59 / AZW U59 (U3E1)
Last post by Octocontrabass -
From my professional experience, albeit twenty years ago by now, you're always going to get a better sound from outboard gear, even if the processor isn't being taxed because it's simply what it's made for. quality outboard gear (e.g. ad/da conversion processes) makes for night and day of course!
Twenty years ago the difference was night and day. Today, onboard audio is good enough that most people will never notice anything wrong with it.

You may be better off getting a laptop instead of another one of those mini-PCs.
7
Support - (fb2k) / Is my Foobar2000 really corrupted?
Last post by sacdman -
I have downloaded and reinstalled Foobar v2.1.4 X64 and reinstalled it. When I check the online troubleshooter, I get this message...

"foobar2000 help: corrupted foobar2000 installation

You have reached this page because you appear to be running a modified or corrupted version of foobar2000, one that did not come from us.

We strongly recommend that you uninstall your copy of foobar2000 and scan your system for malicious software.

Note that you should always download foobar2000 from the official site (www.foobar2000.org). Download it from any other source at your own risk. We have no control over what other people put in their "foobar2000 installers" and take no responsibility for any damage to your system they might cause."

I think this might be in error, since I have downloaded my version of foobar right from foobar2000.org. Any ideas?
8
foobar2000 mobile / Re: How to add a Windows shared folder to Foobar2000?
Last post by Case -
I don't really understand why people ask foobar2000 questions on reddit. Reddit doesn't even seem to show that the original post in the thread you linked was later edited to contain the bit about Android - initially it had no OS information making majority of the replies irrelevant/incorrect.

Android has no SMB support built-in. Android doesn't support FTP either, but it's much simpler protocol and Peter could add support for it relatively easily and quickly.
So officially there is no way to add SMB shares to mobile foobar2000. In theory a program that adds SMB support to the OS might work. I found this program that claims to do it: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.connectedway.spiritcloud.

As a workaround you could run FTP server on Windows and share the same paths over FTP.