Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: 320kbit: Blade vs. Lame (Read 19510 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

320kbit: Blade vs. Lame

Reply #25
Looking at the Frequency spectrum won't tell you a thing about quality as you cannot see problems of the psychoacustic model you might hear.

Lossy compression is always about sounding as the CD not looking as it!

320kbit: Blade vs. Lame

Reply #26
Quote
Looking at the Frequency spectrum won't tell you a thing about quality as you cannot see problems of the psychoacustic model you might hear.

Lossy compression is always about sounding as the CD not looking as it!
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=237801"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]



I see .... said the blind man  Roger that -

 

320kbit: Blade vs. Lame

Reply #27
looking at spectograms for quality determination is a usefull as playing back your jpegs as raw sound to hear the differences.
Sven Bent - Denmark