Skip to main content


Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
Uploads / Re: XLAC! Lossless Audio Converter - WAV / FLAC / APE / WAVPACK / TTA / ALAC
Last post by ktcl7777 -
From , translated ty google:

BLA Basic Lossless Audio
is a lossless audio compression format I modified based on SLAC.
SLAC is a simple lossless audio compression format written by David Bryant, one of the authors of WAVPACK. It can be found here The original intention of the author of the original file is to create a compression format that is comparable to FLAC level 0. After testing and optimization, I made BLA Basic Lossless Audio.


I think , bla, this format is ideal for the card with lite memory et performance (cpu), not for PC ou smartphone
Lossless / Other Codecs / Re: MAC (APE) lack of streaming feature - what does it mean?
Last post by Porcus -
Generally the wiki's lossless comparison needs a few more "why the hell should I care about this?!".
(... which certainly is a matter of tech progress. Nowadays, using a corporate codec gets you a measly 11 months of music onto your 5 TB portable 2.5" drive, but choosing a different format might give you a full year. Perspectives, perspectives ...)

... and the TTA devs still have gotten away with filling in "Pros" like "Symmetric algorithm" and the undocumented "Ultra low latency".
Support - (fb2k) / Re: Foobar writes non-standard APEv2 tags to my WavPack files
Last post by Porcus -
If there is/was album art, bringing the metadata above 1 MB, you would have to use wavpack with --allow-huge-tags in addition to --import-id3. WavPack does not (yet) convert from ID3v2.4 which some DSD files use,  so maybe it is easier to just open both the DSD and the .wv in Mp3tag and copy - that will work whether it is 2.3 or 2.4.

Note that foobar2000 - and most (?) other players - will display certain tags different than they are written in the literal file. You probably have seen the ID3 "POPM" displayed to you as "RATING" rather than "POPULARIMETER".
Lossless / Other Codecs / Re: New lossless codec comparison, categorizing electronic music
Last post by Porcus -
To the extent that people buy (rather than just stream), there is much more hi-rez around by now.  Maybe one doesn't want to lend credibility to the selling point of it, but maybe one doesn't want to put that much opinion into it.

As for "electronic" music that isn't really a genre (maybe it was when it first (?) made the hit lists with Switched-On Bach, but that is more than fifty years ago), then for the purposes of a comparison, one may want to
* cover the genres and styles people may want to compress (probably with more EDM and contemporary hip-hop)
* cover various signals to see if that makes for a difference. 

The first is not unimportant, but it does not classify the way you are asking.

The sorting you are using on the other genres often is a bit "in increasing denseness", and a similar sorting for electronic genres would be from minimalist to Merzbow.  (I see that you are putting Merzbow different, and I kinda disagree here: this kind of noise music is electronic - and *the* CD with a specific trait is the audiobook!)   And for a "denseness" rough sort, you might just see how many bits LAME V0 thinks is adequate? 
But a couple of other dimensions:
Percussive or not?  You got music that is beat-less and you have music dominated by percussion - and percs that are notorious killer samplers for lossies (Prodigy's "Fighter Beat" got infamous on HA ... the version you are listing got this (bonus) track?). 
Vocal-oriented or not?  The instrumentation might still dominate the need for bits, but if the music is an acoustic-recorded signal with instrumentation accompanying it ... that is something else at least "by ear"
Indeed, how much is "recorded in free air" is a classification in itself, only it isn't that obvious to know.  As you mention it sounds a bit artificial (like, cooked up for some constructed purpose), but I think it is a point.

So I suggested the Biosphere for being the chill, non-dense, non-percussive corner of the spectrum - maybe you should find some even more minimalist; some synth industrial for being a missing style (quite dense some of it), Laibach's take on Kunst der Fuge for being instrumental "electronic-only" and apparently not having used a microphone, and I forgot about this techno classic - but even if the Laibach (and Prodigy) got released way into the y2k's, my suggestion list is likely too heavy on "mom and dad's plastic disc collection", and too little of that neo-rave that the music industry rebranded as "EDM" to distinguish it from what parents did - and you seriously need a major hip-hop producer to belt out some beats from the hard drive.

Oh, and one suggestion: while your diagrams are pretty clear on what compresses fastER and slowER, a novice won't necessarily be able to relate it to ... I guess one benchmark is MP3.  Suggestion: a vertical bar (as to not mix size into it) that indicates speed of LAME default 128 CBR?  And/or maybe an AAC if there is a "canonical" encoder choice.