Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
21
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: Dynamic Range plugin
Last post by Tropoje -
Could someone please write down what these parameters mean?
(FL) (FR) (FC) (LFE) (BL) (BR)

How to read it? When is it good and when is not good, Does more mean better sound or does as less means better sound?

This is the result of scanning my CD
X

Quote
foobar2000 v2.1.5 / DR Meter v0.4
log date: 2024-05-18 19:57:54

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: Ian Gillan / Dreamcatcher
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR         Peak         RMS     Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR8       -0.88 dB   -11.37 dB      5:22 01-Chandra's Coriander
DR10      -0.97 dB   -12.83 dB      3:59 02-Prima Donna
DR8       -0.89 dB   -10.81 dB      4:14 03-All In My Mind
DR12      -0.76 dB   -13.77 dB      3:33 04-That's Why God Is Singin' The Blues
DR9       -0.83 dB   -11.68 dB      2:51 05-Gunga Din
DR9       -0.57 dB   -12.18 dB      4:46 06-Hard On You
DR10      -0.75 dB   -12.68 dB      3:54 07-Sleepy Warm
DR10      -0.57 dB   -12.44 dB      3:48 08-Country Mile
DR9       -0.69 dB   -12.05 dB      4:10 09-You Sold My Love For A Song
DR8       -0.87 dB   -11.11 dB      4:28 10-A Day Late 'N' A Dollar Short
DR8       -0.80 dB   -10.48 dB      4:54 11-Sugar Plum
DR13      -1.01 dB   -16.33 dB      3:41 12-Anyway You Want Me (That's How I Will Be)
DR10      -0.57 dB   -12.96 dB      4:40 13-High Ground
DR11      -1.14 dB   -14.58 dB      4:08 14-Sleepy Warm (Alternative Version)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of tracks:  14
Official DR value: DR10

Samplerate:        44100 Hz
Channels:          2
Bits per sample:   16
Bitrate:           927 kbps
Codec:             FLAC
================================================================================

Help me understand this, I am a biologist not a sound engineer  :o
23
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_truepeak True Peak Scanner
Last post by Defender -
The LUFS test version at https://foobar.hyv.fi/foo_truepeak_0.6.8.fb2k-component was just refreshed.

Nice.

Just for my understanding. I removed the old version. Restarted foobar and installed the updated version.
I still see the names I entered for LUFS-S/M which are:
truepeak_scanner_max_lufs_s_track
truepeak_scanner_max_lufs_m_track.

Can you confirm that your default names upon first time installation are:
truepeak_scanner_track_max_lufs_s
truepeak_scanner_track_max_lufs_m

Thx for looking into the speed/performance problem as well.

EDIT: Sorry, let me rephrase .. What are all default names for custom fields you provide upon first-time installation?

EDIT2: You just hit one of my major annoyance points in foobar ...  the settings screen is not resizable and you have now more options than one small settings screen.
24
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_truepeak True Peak Scanner
Last post by darkflame23 -
Is the Clip count based on the PCM sample value, or the True Peak reading? I am assuming the former, as I have scanned a number of albums showing TP levels of above digital zero, but the Clip shows zero too.
Clip count is calculated from the upsampled signal currently. Are you certain about clip count showing zero? That should not be possible.

Yes, using this string to display the Clip count in the playlist:

%truepeak_scanner_clipped_samples_track%

And this King Tubby CD is showing dBTP overs of up to +2.45dB on one track, but the Clip count is zero for every track.
26
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: foo_truepeak True Peak Scanner
Last post by Case -
The LUFS test version at https://foobar.hyv.fi/foo_truepeak_0.6.8.fb2k-component was just refreshed. Version number intentionally kept the same as I'm still tweaking things for public release.

There's now an option to also include LUFS-I tags when ReplayGain scanning. Album variants of LUFS-M and LUFS-S tags are now also supported.

I too noticed that momentary and short-term loudness evaluation is very slow. First test version called the calculations after each processed audio chunk. Refreshed build runs the calculations approximately every 100 ms. Sadly the results change a bit depending on when the calculations are done. I will need to tweak this behavior still a bit, I don't like that the numbers change for bit-identical data depending on how many samples a decoder produces per decode pass.

There was also a stupid mistake with SoX upsampling setup that was found thanks to @ngs428's sharp eyes. SoX upsampling mistakenly didn't use the power-of-two resampling ratio that it was meant to. Processing speed is now a bit faster as this issue was fixed.
29
AAC - General / Re: QAAC: discussion, questions, feature requests, etc.
Last post by phadron -
You can merge in ffmpeg on-the-fly and pipe merged output to qaac.

Code: [Select]
ffmpeg -hide_banner -i '.\ENG_L.wav' -i '.\ENG_R.wav' -i '.\ENG_C.wav' -i '.\ENG_LFE.wav' -i '.\ENG_BL.wav' -i '.\ENG_BR.wav' -i '.\ENG_SL.wav' -i '.\ENG_SR.wav' -filter_complex "[0:a][1:a][2:a][3:a][4:a][5:a][6:a][7:a]join=inputs=8:channel_layout=7.1:map=0.0-FL|1.0-FR|2.0-FC|3.0-LFE|4.0-BL|5.0-BR|6.0-SL|7.0-SR[a]" -map "[a]" -f wav -bitexact - | .\qaac64.exe --chanmask=0x63f -o output.m4a -

Code: [Select]
ResourceUnavailable: Program 'ffmpeg.exe' failed to run: Closing pipe.At line:1 char:1
+ ffmpeg -hide_banner -i '.\ENG_L.wav' -i '.\ENG_R.wav' -i '.\ENG_C.wav …
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

What's wrong with this? :)

PS
JOIN audio filter: https://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-filters.html#toc-join