Choice of AAC codecs for listening test
Reply #23 – 2004-02-09 16:35:49
ABC/HR resultsABC/HR Version 0.9b, 30 August 2002 Testname: DaFunk 1L = N:\DaFunk_1.wav 2R = N:\DaFunk_2.wav --------------------------------------- General Comments: --------------------------------------- 1L File: N:\DaFunk_1.wav 1L Rating: 3.5 1L Comment: 0.0-3.3: flanging, clackling noise, difference gets easily lost during quick ABXing 3.3-16.0: differences less obvious/annoying 16.0-20.6: differences similar to the beginning --------------------------------------- 2R File: N:\DaFunk_2.wav 2R Rating: 2.5 2R Comment: 0.0-3.3: flanging, 'airy' bumping noises added, very obvious, annoying 3.3-16.0: differences less obvious/annoying 16.0-20.6: differences similar to the beginning --------------------------------------- ABX Results: Original vs N:\DaFunk_1.wav 11 out of 15, pval = 0.059 Original vs N:\DaFunk_2.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016 N:\DaFunk_1.wav vs N:\DaFunk_2.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016 ABC/HR Version 0.9b, 30 August 2002 Testname: Gone 1L = N:\gone_2.wav 2L = N:\gone_1.wav --------------------------------------- General Comments: --------------------------------------- 1L File: N:\gone_2.wav 1L Rating: 3.0 1L Comment: 2.5-5.0: background noise brighter + changed (bumping) --------------------------------------- 2L File: N:\gone_1.wav 2L Rating: 3.0 2L Comment: 2.5-5.0: similar to 1, there seems to be a difference, but hard to tell which is better starting at 9.0 there's flanging (cymbal sounds), again different between 1 and 2 but impossible to tell which is better for me. --------------------------------------- ABX Results: Original vs N:\gone_2.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016 Original vs N:\gone_1.wav 12 out of 16, pval = 0.038 N:\gone_2.wav vs N:\gone_1.wav 6 out of 6, pval = 0.016