Here the updated data i promised:
- Encoding speed measured without file output.
- Corrected some errors in V0.09 data (especially preset HIGH).
- Only test set rw, because it seems more representative.
- More comparisons.
Absolute values for test set rw
Enco-Rate Fast Normal High Extra
V0.07 37,75 15,74 6,45 3,95
V0.08a 37,93 15,63 6,01 2,69
V0.09 37,76 15,41 7,87 3,94
Deco-Rate Fast Normal High Extra
V0.07 68,61 58,37 51,81 53,67
V0.08a 69,46 57,83 43,79 46,63
V0.09 67,62 53,47 45,43 41,10
Compression Fast Normal High Extra
V0.07 57,31 56,71 56,36 56,27
V0.08a 57,31 56,71 56,20 56,10
V0.09 57,19 56,51 56,24 56,02
Comparisons for test set rw (in percent)
V0.08 vs V0.07
Fast Normal High Extra
Compression 0,00 0,00 0,16 0,17
Encode 0,48 -0,70 -6,82 -31,90
Decode 1,24 -0,93 -15,48 -13,12
V0.09 vs V0.07
Fast Normal High Extra
Compression 0,12 0,20 0,12 0,25
Encode 0,03 -2,10 22,02 -0,25
Decode -1,44 -8,39 -12,31 -23,42
V0.09 vs V0.08
Fast Normal High Extra
Compression 0,12 0,20 -0,04 0,08
Encode -0,45 -1,40 28,84 31,65
Decode -2,65 -7,54 3,75 -11,86
I will be back for some comments soon...
Edit: I forgot: Test system is a Pentium III with 800 MHz...