Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Wanted v0.9 plugin ports (Read 749057 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #351 –
4Front Headphones Plugin has been ported to 0.9.
Enjoy It! 
I'm Korean.
My english is poor. : (

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #352 –
I would like to see an update of foo_dynamics from 0.8.3, and also, foo_skip_silence.

foo_vlevel only amplifies the volume of the track, it doesn't compress the entire waveform.  It's extremely noticable when this occurs. Quiet instruments will be loud and then they will be far too quiet as something louder comes in. foo_dynamics compressed the whole waveform so all of the different instruments ended up being at about the same level.

and why wasn't skip_silence included with 0.9? it's essential.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #353 –
Good news about foo_dsp_skip_silence (click) that seems to be quite popular.
Once again Acropolis saved the day 

(see: the remark about vc++ runtime dll's)
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #354 –
10 days since the first post was updated, maybe more than one person can keep the post updated?

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #355 –
Why foo_unpack is still in the Wanted ports list as it is included in the foobar installer?? I guess you can remove it

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #356 –
Aye RavenSoft, sorry but I was busy with school stuff, the end of the year is a bit of a rush. It's updated.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #357 –
"foo_wma implemented into 0.9.1"
Only half-implemented. Tagging is not implemented.

So I would like to add foo_wma to the wanted list please.
Thank you!

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #358 –
Quote from: CSMR on
"foo_wma implemented into 0.9.1"
Only half-implemented. Tagging is not implemented.

So I would like to add foo_wma to the wanted list please.
Thank you!

It's unlikely to happen as the wma support is included in foo_input_std.
 

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #359 –
Only half-included as I said!

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #360 –
Quote from: CSMR on
Only half-included as I said!


I mean it's not quite possible to write another plugin to support wma, as foo_input_std will not ask other plugins to play wma as it can support playing them.

so the possible solutions are:
1. make foo_input_std open source, so people can implement the undone part
2. ask the developer to finish the undone part
3. remove the wma support in foo_input_std to let people implement a new one
4. change all wma extension to other, and have a new plugin to play the files with that extension

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #361 –
Quote from: Acropolis on
I mean it's not quite possible to write another plugin to support wma, as foo_input_std will not ask other plugins to play wma as it can support playing them.

So it's impossible to create a separate plug-in which would only take care of the tags. Tagging is so bound to the playback part ?

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #363 –
It is not possible to split the functionality of an input service across multiple instances, so no, you cannot implement tagging and playback of a given format in separate components.

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #364 –
Quote from: Acropolis on
I mean it's not quite possible to write another plugin to support wma, as foo_input_std will not ask other plugins to play wma as it can support playing them.

so the possible solutions are:
1. make foo_input_std open source, so people can implement the undone part
2. ask the developer to finish the undone part
3. remove the wma support in foo_input_std to let people implement a new one
4. change all wma extension to other, and have a new plugin to play the files with that extension

I see; thanks for explaining!

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #365 –
Question: am I missing something about foo_utils? 'Cause I can't quite see some of the options I had in foo_playlist_output... Like the whole 'write playlist to a file' part? =s

Nice list anyways, useful ^^

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #366 –
shouldnt foo_dsp_soundtouch be moved to the updated plugins list?

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #367 –
prettypop is updated to version 1.2.3

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #368 –
how about foo_centercut ?

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #369 –
It seems that foo_uie_tabs has been ported to 0.9

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #370 –
i'm  looking for foo_speex, foo_lpac and foo_la for 0.9.2.
does someone have information of those components?

edit: drunkn' typo^^;
<name>madoka</name>

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #371 –
I've been looking for speex support since the advent of the 0.9x series. I'm very glad to hear I'm not the only user who would appreciate it.

But those of us who cannot program can only "possess our souls in patience", as Sherlock Holmes would say.

Jim

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #373 –
Thank you for that bit of info., kjoonlee. I respectfully echo the request that some kind soul please port it.

Jim

Wanted v0.9 plugin ports

Reply #374 –
The foo_dts download link is missing.