Skip to main content

Topic: FLAC vs. LAME 320kbps CBR - foobar2000 ABX test (Read 1904 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • ds898
  • [*]
FLAC vs. LAME 320kbps CBR - foobar2000 ABX test
foo_abx 2.0.1 report
foobar2000 v1.3.12
2017-02-08 20:52:40

File A: 3.01. Violin Sonata No. 9 in A, Op. 47 'Kreutzer' - I. Adagio sostenuto.flac
SHA1: e4f0236378b66307b7e48e840d5d07bba3f26a89
File B: 01. I. Adagio sostenuto.mp3
SHA1: 47a78d9708ebd2ddc078c89fb528674c4f8ef53a

Output:
DS : Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio)
Crossfading: NO

20:52:40 : Test started.
20:58:28 : 00/01
21:01:03 : 01/02
21:02:41 : 02/03
21:06:00 : 02/04
21:07:11 : 02/05
21:07:59 : 03/06
21:08:30 : 03/07
21:09:11 : 03/08
21:11:32 : 04/09
21:12:33 : 04/10
21:13:23 : 05/11
21:13:53 : 06/12
21:14:57 : 07/13
21:15:59 : 08/14
21:16:39 : 09/15
21:16:59 : 10/16
21:16:59 : Test finished.

 ----------
Total: 10/16
Probability that you were guessing: 22.7%

 -- signature --
6907b052c3aa192e110331725d9effd73e0a8f98

  • board
  • [*][*]
Re: FLAC vs. LAME 320kbps CBR - foobar2000 ABX test
Reply #1
It might be a coincidence, but it seemed like you were getting the hang of it at the end, so it would have been great if you had done the test again afterwards to see if you got a better result.
"What is asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence"
- Christopher Hitchens
"It is always more difficult to fight against faith than against knowledge"
- Sam Harris