HydrogenAudio

Hydrogenaudio Forum => Listening Tests => Topic started by: ds898 on 2017-02-09 02:24:16

Title: FLAC vs. LAME 320kbps CBR - foobar2000 ABX test
Post by: ds898 on 2017-02-09 02:24:16
foo_abx 2.0.1 report
foobar2000 v1.3.12
2017-02-08 20:52:40

File A: 3.01. Violin Sonata No. 9 in A, Op. 47 'Kreutzer' - I. Adagio sostenuto.flac
SHA1: e4f0236378b66307b7e48e840d5d07bba3f26a89
File B: 01. I. Adagio sostenuto.mp3
SHA1: 47a78d9708ebd2ddc078c89fb528674c4f8ef53a

Output:
DS : Speakers (Realtek High Definition Audio)
Crossfading: NO

20:52:40 : Test started.
20:58:28 : 00/01
21:01:03 : 01/02
21:02:41 : 02/03
21:06:00 : 02/04
21:07:11 : 02/05
21:07:59 : 03/06
21:08:30 : 03/07
21:09:11 : 03/08
21:11:32 : 04/09
21:12:33 : 04/10
21:13:23 : 05/11
21:13:53 : 06/12
21:14:57 : 07/13
21:15:59 : 08/14
21:16:39 : 09/15
21:16:59 : 10/16
21:16:59 : Test finished.

 ----------
Total: 10/16
Probability that you were guessing: 22.7%

 -- signature --
6907b052c3aa192e110331725d9effd73e0a8f98
Title: Re: FLAC vs. LAME 320kbps CBR - foobar2000 ABX test
Post by: board on 2017-04-17 16:08:20
It might be a coincidence, but it seemed like you were getting the hang of it at the end, so it would have been great if you had done the test again afterwards to see if you got a better result.