Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: [TOS#8] Spreading quackery from old quack articles (Read 1525 times) previous topic - next topic - Topic derived from Does mp3 have more ba...
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: [TOS#8] Spreading quackery from old quack articles

Reply #1 –
Stereophile is full of nonsense (like most of the "audiophile" community).    They don't believe in blind listening tests.  ...Those solid gold speaker wires sound so much better than regular copper that there's no need for blind testing!  :P


I don't read Stereophile but I think they like things that are super-expensive and/or outdated (vacuum tubes & vinyl records).