Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Benchmark's take on the evils of digital (Read 11697 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Benchmark's take on the evils of digital

Reply #25 –
Quote from: JSW on
I don't think Telarc ever used compression/eq back in the day.
I never heard anything objectionable from Linn records "back in the day" either! But now they can offer 24/96, tell everyone it's better, and because it's 24/96 some people believe them - despite quite aggressive* DRC which means it's definitively worse (assuming you think it's better to be closer to the original sound).

* - by the standards of an "audiophile" record label. We're not talking RHCP Californication here!

Cheers,
David.