Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Badly drawn waveforms vs. the audio that’s actually output—filters etc (Read 13540 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Badly drawn waveforms vs. the audio that’s actually output—filters etc

Reply #25
The digital waveform in the first picture is a plot of the samples. It is a correct plot of the samples .

Not quite. It is a plot of the samples with straight lines drawn between them, something no DAC would ever do.

Badly drawn waveforms vs. the audio that’s actually output—filters etc

Reply #26
The digital waveform in the first picture is a plot of the samples. It is a correct plot of the samples .

Not quite. It is a plot of the samples with straight lines drawn between them, something no DAC would ever do.



true,  true,  adding the lines is dubious.    I used audacity a few years ago and as I remember the lines switch off at the sample resolution magnification. I wonder what software  the original "plots" came from.

Badly drawn waveforms vs. the audio that’s actually output—filters etc

Reply #27
just checked audacity  , the lines stay on .