Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
33
General - (fb2k) / Re: mp3 track reported as corrunpted but playing well
Last post by AndreaT -
Hi @Case , I confirm the following 2 (only two) mp3 file are reported as corrupted or usupported format, but Integrity Check says all OK, as well as real Play goes fine.
Please, see herein attachments for details. And, if of help, I can provide you also the 2 mp3 files.
Regards, Andrea

PS: In the library error log, obviously, the .ts files are unsupported because are video.
36
foobar2000 mobile / No BACK button in Foobar2000 for mobile devices
Last post by casfoob -
I'm trying to use the Foobar app on a tablet without a physical BACK button and without persistent navigation surfaces on the screen.

Now I can't find a way to navigate back from some Foobar pages, e.g. the page where music folders can be selected and (re)scanned. There's no BACK button.

Example: the ReplayGain page. When open it, I seem to be stuck on it, and can't go back

How can I navigate back (and forth) in Foobar?
37
Validated News / Re: freedb.org to close
Last post by moogleinc -
Magix the company which took over freedb.org has decided to close down the service.

dBpoweramp have created a freedb server which can be used when freedb shuts down:

freedb.dbpoweramp.com

Note currently only http is supported


That’s unfortunate to hear about freedb.org shutting down, but big thanks to dBpoweramp for stepping up and providing an alternative! It’s great to see the community keeping the spirit of freedb alive. Hopefully, HTTPS support will be added soon for better security.
39
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.5.x Performance Tests
Last post by genuine -
Instead of thinking too much I did a quick test. Since we are talking about speed. Decoder seems to be a bit faster but Encoder is really worse. And only on AVX2 supported CPUs.
3,209,871,510 bytes (86 tracks, 2 channels, 16 bit, 48 khz) and AMD CPU(AVX2), Single Thread

FLAC VersionEncode sDecode s
FLAC 1.4.321.252 s16.564 s
FLAC 1.5.028.376 s14.752 s
FLAC 1.5.0 Disasm29.688 s14.500 s
When i looked at the Flac 1.5.0 Avx2 version, i saw that it was 109,184 bytes less than normal. Since the difference in 3.2 GB of data was meaningless, it escaped my attention. Personally, i had higher expectations when it came to speed(despite Avx2). I thank the developers for their efforts.
40
General - (fb2k) / Edit a tag with increments of + or - 0.5
Last post by Albicocche -
The "Quick Tagger" component has a "rating" field with the following values: "-1;0;0.5;1;1.5;2;2.5;3;3.5;4;4.5;5".

I would like to add two values: "+;-" which modify the "rating" field by adding or subtracting 0.5 to the currently set value.

Is it possible? How can this be done?