Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Recent Posts
7
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: Device-Priority-SMP
Last post by Defender -
Quote from: regor on
Quote from: Defender on
"devicePriority.properties.fixNoDevice[1] <= 10 ? 10 : 25);"

I don't understand the syntax.
What's the first 10, second 10 and the 25?
What do I change to lower the timings to let's say half? 5, 5, 12?
I'm sorry but i will not help with basic JS syntax, that's on your side. Look for ternary operator.
You helped. It's just shorthand for an if-then-else statement.

Quote from: regor on
This one adds a setting to tweak the workaround timing (which is now disabled by default). On line 363 you may lower the time it starts to apply after turning off a device, in case it still fails.
How do I enable the workaround? Otherwise changing values is no use at all I guess.

I appreciate the time and effort you already put in this a lot, but your instructions are not clear and I'm not going to experiment with a line with 3 variables (the condition, the true part and the else part) not knowing if this code is actually active or not (since neither are logged to the console).
I'm also a bit confused that after you spend all this time already you don't want to share a couple of lines on explaining what the 3 parts do, and I can actually understand what I'm changing & testing.

Please tell me how to activate the workaround and what the values do. I'm not going all monkey and start changing 3 parameters in the blind.

BTW. Yesterday in the afternoon I already suggested it's probably a timing issue. Maybe I should have added that I have a rather fast machine.
9
MP3 - General / Re: Resurrecting/Preserving the Helix MP3 encoder
Last post by john33 -
Quote from: maikmerten on
Thanks for the various builds! It's interesting to see what compilers give what results.

(In particular, I'm interested to see how modern compilers fare compared to the old Visual Studio with the somewhat archaic ASM parts - I think those are somewhat superfluous and suboptimal now.)
...
Intel/MASM build: 11.44 secs
win32-P4 optimised: 11.53 secs (no MASM)
Generic x64: 9.58 secs
AVX2 optimised: 10.09 secs!!
All encoding the 800MB Beatles 'Love Album'.

Edit: Bottom 3 are all GCC 14.1.0.