Skip to main content ↑ ↓

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Lame VS Gogo (Read 2579 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lame VS Gogo

I usually rip my cd's with cdex and lame 3.93.1 dll in 192 cbr -q 5 and joint stereo mode. Can I get the same quality using the gogo 3.12 dll? The configuration of gogo dll in cdex is poor (no -q option  ) but the speed of gogo is great in my old system.
Living forevermore, leaving today, back to my place, I've got: Nothing to say!
 

Lame VS Gogo

Reply #1 –
Quote
I usually rip my cd's with cdex and lame 3.93.1 dll in 192 cbr -q 5 and joint stereo mode. Can I get the same quality using the gogo 3.12 dll? The configuration of gogo dll in cdex is poor (no -q option  ) but the speed of gogo is great in my old system.

If you're really looking for quality, no you won't. But, for casual listening in noisy environments you're unlikely to notice a huge difference. I suggest you try it for yourself and form your own opinion.