Skip to main content

Topic: TAK - author burnt out or too busy? (Read 3680 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • johnsonlam
  • [*][*][*]
TAK - author burnt out or too busy?
Hi,

Several months ago, I'm asking the same question.
Wish Tom still want to develop TAK, as the compression rate and speed really good.

Hong Kong - International Joke Center (after 1997-06-30)

  • yourlord
  • [*][*][*][*]
Re: TAK - author burnt out or too busy?
Reply #1
I'm not aware he has given up development. If he ever does, I would hope he would open the code so the work he has done can be continued and implemented on other platforms.

  • recur
  • [*]
Re: TAK - author burnt out or too busy?
Reply #2
Must we really open another TAK thread? Or maybe it would be better to remove this topic and refer to already existing one(hint hint)?

  • lvqcl
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Re: TAK - author burnt out or too busy?
Reply #3
Quote
author burnt out or too busy?
Does it really matter? What's the difference for you? Either way there's no version newer than 2.3.0.

Re: TAK - author burnt out or too busy?
Reply #4
I hope a new version is still on the works.
Probably one of the greatest lossless codecs out there. Too important piece of software to be neglected.

Would very much like a full Unicode support, and 64-Bit support as well. (And it might be good idea to add 32-bit audio compatibility, just because WavPack has one.)

  • mudlord
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer (Donating)
Re: TAK - author burnt out or too busy?
Reply #5
Unlikely.

Theres nothing stopping other people making another codec, this time using ANS instead of Rice coding >_>. Last I seen, the Flake FLAC encoder is pretty easy to follow in terms of code, so understanding a lossless codec's function shouldn't be hard, plus FLAC has extensive docs.