I have been using Nero; it came with a CD burner I bought some time ago. I would like to find an open-source solution, and am not ready to make the switch to linux (yet); CDRDAO seems limited in its functionality.
Are there any other options?
Thanks, in advance.
Feurio is the program for burning audio CDs. -> http://www.feurio.de/ (http://www.feurio.de/)
It's unlimited shareware, which means that you can start it as many times as you like, and use it without any restrictions. One good word of advice: Don't try to crack it, there's nothing to gain.. and even worse, Feurio will severely act up if it detects a "blacklisted" key... :spank:
It's simply a great program with endless possibilities for arranging your audio CDs.
I use Roxio Easy CD creator, but I have been having issues with how it mixes up my song order if I don't start filenames with a number. That is only when burning data CDs filled with mp3s for my car stereo, btw. It really shines making audio CDs, as it lets you crossfade songs any way you like.
But now that you mention it, I think I will try out that Feurio dealy-bopper. It looks neat.
Thanks for the replies, I will give feurio a try this evening...
But are there any open-source (or plain freeware) data-burning programs for Win32 out there somewhere?
yup...
try theese to...
interface(w32) for cdrtools...
http://demosten.com/cdrfe/ (http://demosten.com/cdrfe/)
and jamieo`s gui for cdrdao...
http://www.burnatonce.co.uk/ (http://www.burnatonce.co.uk/)
Originally posted by n68
yup...
try theese to...
interface(w32) for cdrtools...
http://demosten.com/cdrfe/ (http://demosten.com/cdrfe/)
fukkin wankers.. they try to install the gator spyware module on your system as soon as u enter the site. beware
I think Nero is the best cdr program out there... it does *so* much; I have no idea about opensource cdr utils though.
lol-I had given up on this thread...
Thanks for the heads-up. There is NO need to install spyware...
The cdrdaoGUI looks interesting, I will have to give it a try...
I say Feurio!!
for AudioCDs it's the best
Roxio Easy CD Creator 5 Platinum works excellently for me! It's easy to use and it gets the job done.
What's wrong with using EAC to burn audio CD's? Its write feature is working fine with the latest version. And if you figure out your drive's offset correction, you can get Exact Audio Copies. I use it exclusively to make dupes. For custom audio CDs, I use EAC to extract the *.wav and Nero to burn (although EAC can do that also). I use Nero for data CDs.
D. Duck
Originally posted by Daffy
What's wrong with using EAC to burn audio CD's?
It doesn't support all burners. It doesn't support SafeBurn or other buffer underrun systems. It has some issues with some drives burning the lead-out.
Originally posted by Daffy
And if you figure out your drive's offset correction, you can get Exact Audio Copies.
You get Exact Audio Copies in the window defined by Andre as being the reference for burning. Original offsets are calculated so that the copies are late, compared to the original. It is an added safety that you're loosing when you enable offset correction.
I only recommand Offset correction for mastering jobs, or in addition with checking the audio data of the original CD in an accurate wav editor (i.e. capable of vertical overzooming), in order not to loose any data at the beginning of track 1, because we can't know the offset used by factories for making the CDs.
Originally posted by macdaddy
I have been using Nero; it came with a CD burner I bought some time ago. I would like to find an open-source solution, and am not ready to make the switch to linux (yet)
Uh, macdaddy.. Feurio may be the better choice for Audio disks, but why not just keep using Nero? You want to use only open source software? Trying to save money? You do know that once you buy Nero, you can upgrade it forever, right?
Nothing wrong with using only open source stuff.. just wondering.
Jon
nero is by far the best for all burning jobs in my experience (used it since before version 4). cdrwin = bad interface, easy cd = bad burns, horribly dumbed down interface (though I haven't tried the last few versions). fireburner = ok. it used to be free, and that was a big plus, but now it costs $$ and isn't as good as nero.
To slightly change the topic, has anyone noticed that using burnproof gives lesser quality burns? I've noticed I can see on the bottom of the disc exactly where it changed speeds. That makes me nervous. Also a movie I burnt seemed to skip at the exact point burnproof kicked in (not certain on that) My version of burnproof is called 'exaclink' on a new msi 32x burner. For now, just to be safe, I'm burning data stuff at 12x without burnproof, and audio stuff at 8x without burnproof.
Originally posted by floyd
nero is by far the best for all burning jobs in my experience (used it since before version 4). cdrwin = bad interface, easy cd = bad burns, horribly dumbed down interface (though I haven't tried the last few versions). fireburner = ok. it used to be free, and that was a big plus, but now it costs $$ and isn't as good as nero.
I love NTI CDmaker. The interface is horrendous, but if is packed with features you won't find anywhere else (like Romeo file name extension support) and is rock-stable.
Regards;
Roberto.
Originally posted by CiTay
Feurio is the program for burning audio CDs. -> http://www.feurio.de/ (http://www.feurio.de/)
whats the limitation of feurio? are there nag screens, timeouts, ...?
Originally posted by floyd
has anyone noticed that using burnproof gives lesser quality burns? I've noticed I can see on the bottom of the disc exactly where it changed speeds.
Isn't it the effect of Zone-CLV instead of burnproof :eyebrow: ?
I never had a coaster with it...
I do Data and Audio CD's(convert to .wav first-using MAD)...
Reliable burning proggie IMO.
Great compatibility with diff drives...
LIF
Originally posted by Pio2001
Isn't it the effect of Zone-CLV instead of burnproof :eyebrow: ?
possibly.. when i used burnproof i burnt at 24x or higher to test it, so maybe at 12x it can stay at a constant speed the entire time. regardless, im a bit concerned about cds that appear physically different on the bottom.
I might be wrong but there was a site that tested all burning software. I wish I could remember were it was now but they said Nero had a problem in the 14k - 16k range. I believe media jukebox was rated pretty high. That is what I switched to I was using Nero.
Originally posted by Pio2001
It doesn't support all burners. It doesn't support SafeBurn or other buffer underrun systems. It has some issues with some drives burning the lead-out.
True. I forgot about this. Thanks for clarifying.
Originally posted by Pio2001
You get Exact Audio Copies in the window defined by Andre as being the reference for burning. Original offsets are calculated so that the copies are late, compared to the original. It is an added safety that you're loosing when you enable offset correction.
I don't understand this clearly. Can you re-explain in newbie terms.
Originally posted by Pio2001
I only recommand Offset correction for mastering jobs, or in addition with checking the audio data of the original CD in an accurate wav editor (i.e. capable of vertical overzooming), in order not to loose any data at the beginning of track 1, because we can't know the offset used by factories for making the CDs.
So you recommend we use a 0 in the read sample offset correction field in EAC?
As you can tell, I need your help.....:needhelp:
Also PIO2001, what burning software do you recommended for copying audio CDs? I value your opion. Thanks.
Daffy
Originally posted by smg
I might be wrong but there was a site that tested all burning software. I wish I could remember were it was now but they said Nero had a problem in the 14k - 16k range. I believe media jukebox was rated pretty high. That is what I switched to I was using Nero.
I wouldn't mind seeing a link to this. I don't see how freq response could be 1% related to a burning program. Its just copying a 16-bit 44khz wav to disc. Shouldn't modify the waveform whatsoever.
Originally posted by floyd
I wouldn't mind seeing a link to this. I don't see how freq response could be 1% related to a burning program. Its just copying a 16-bit 44khz wav to disc. Shouldn't modify the waveform whatsoever.
Ok I found it. It is from are friend 2bdecided ...David
http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html (http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html)
let me know if I am reading this correct
Originally posted by smg
Ok I found it. It is from are friend 2bdecided ...David
http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html (http://privatewww.essex.ac.uk/~djmrob/mp3decoders/index.html)
let me know if I am reading this correct
Eheh.
It says the flaw is in Nero's MP3 decoder, not in the Audio CD writing routines.
Originally posted by rjamorim
Eheh.
It says the flaw is in Nero's MP3 decoder, not in the Audio CD writing routines.
Here is a section under conclusions.
Burning mp3s to audio CD
With modern fast PCs, it is possible to decode an mp3 file and burn it onto audio CD at the same time. Several CD writing packages offer this feature, called "on-the-fly" decoding. The alternative is to decode to .wav first, then burn these .wavs onto audio CD. The end result is the same, but this process takes longer, and requires enough free hard disk space to store the .wavs. However, it may be more reliable than "on-the-fly" decoding on slow PCs, and allows you to edit and normalize the .wavs before burning them to CD.
No packages offering "on-the-fly" decoding were perfect. Here is a list some CD-writing packages, together with their problems.
Easy CD Creator Deluxe 4 clips the end off many files, and costs around $99.
HyCD makes slight errors above 16kHz, and has poor low level accuracy.
Media Jukebox actually decodes to wav internally BEFORE writing to CD. It works well, but is no faster than decoding externally using other software. Not true "on-the-fly", but easy for the novice. No decoding faults.
MusicMatch Jukebox was not tested writing CDs, but its decoder makes an audible error with a particular lame encoded tone sweep.
Nero has slight high frequency errors, and costs $49.
Real Jukebox records the CDs in track at once mode, giving a 2 second gap between tracks. No decoding faults.
Windows Media Player 7B would not work with my CD writer, so could not be tested. The decoding engine is excellent, so it may write CDs perfectly.
WinOnCD can't handle VBR files, exhibits the 100Hz bug, and gives high frequency errors. More recent versions may have fixed these problems. It costs $59.
Real Jukebox and Media Jukebox are both good choices if you don't want to spend any money, and are quite easy to use. If you already own Easy CD Creator Deluxe 4, and don't mind the last 1/20th second being clipped off your files, then that is a good choice too. For CDs that really matter, I still decode to .wav first
Read the section for Nero
Originally posted by smg
Read the section for Nero
So?
I read the Nero section:
Nero has slight high frequency errors, and costs .
And I still say it's related to MP3 decoding, not CD writing.
Keep in mind that the entire site you linked is dedicated to MP3 decoder comparision only - David Robinson is not reviewing CD writers there.
Regards;
Roberto.
Originally posted by rjamorim
Eheh.
It says the flaw is in Nero's MP3 decoder, not in the Audio CD writing routines.
It decodes on the fly when you burn. Does that mean you must first decode to a .wav before using nero to burn to prevent the hi freg flaw
Originally posted by smg
It decodes on the fly when you burn. Does that mean you must first decode to a .wav before using nero to burn to prevent the hi freg flaw
Yes. And decode with a
good decoder, like Winamp, mpg123 or mad.
Besides, this bug might have been addressed in the latest versions. It would be worth checking.
Regards;
Roberto.
Originally posted by rjamorim
I love NTI CDmaker. The interface is horrendous, but if is packed with features you won't find anywhere else (like Romeo file name extension support) and is rock-stable.
Regards;
Roberto.
Ditto... I like how NTI CD Maker Pro fills the name of the disc image with the current date/time, rather than just calling it "NEW" like Nero (and forcing you to give it a name).
And I don't think the interface is bad... interfaces are matters of preference. Nero looks rather horrendous to me (way too cluttered), after using NTI awhile.
Originally posted by fewtch
And I don't think the interface is bad... interfaces are matters of preference. Nero looks rather horrendous to me (way too cluttered), after using NTI awhile.
Well, my problem is that I can't stand that bald guy with a cook hat.
And the background thing... : / One of these days I must create a blanked-out bitmap and use it as background.
Originally posted by rjamorim
Well, my problem is that I can't stand that bald guy with a cook hat.
And the background thing... : / One of these days I must create a blanked-out bitmap and use it as background.
I rather like the backgrounds, but could do without the guy in the hat .
Another thing about NTI is it adds very few registry entries... Nero adds several hundred, and especially on a Win98 system the registry has to be kept to a reasonable size.
i always wondered whether that "on-the-fly" mp3 writing in nero would be problematic. luckily I rarely burn mp3's back to disk.
but for next time, its best to use MAD and winamp to decode to wav? Does that mean use the the diskwriter plugin and listen to each and every song with it to create wavs? That is pretty time prohibitive.
Originally posted by rjamorim
Yes. And decode with a good decoder, like Winamp, mpg123 or mad.
Besides, this bug might have been addressed in the latest versions. It would be worth checking.
Regards;
Roberto.
Good point. If you have to go straight from mp3 to audio on disk, you can choose which decoder to do it with.
And, another good point. One of the things I like about Nero.. is that they regularly crank out new versions/updates about every month or so..
whats the limitation of feurio? are there nag screens, timeouts, ...?
Only nag-screens, when you start it. Otherwise, it's 100% usable and non-crippled.
possibly.. when i used burnproof i burnt at 24x or higher to test it, so maybe at 12x it can stay at a constant speed the entire time. regardless, im a bit concerned about cds that appear physically different on the bottom.
Usually, Z-CLV starts at 24x. 16x and 20x speeds should be plain CLV, which should be better for burning audio CDs, in theory.
Re: www.mp3decoders.org (http://www.mp3decoders.org)
The errors were in the mp3 decoding by nero, not nero audio CD burning in general. Please note that the test is quite old - a newer version of nero might have fixed the bug.
For the "anally retentive" kind of people who read this site, you really should be decoding to .wav separately first! I'm not saying it will sound any better, but it gives you the option to...
1. decode to 24-bit accuracy and dither down (e.g. use MAD)
2. check the sampling rate is correct, and use a good quality resampling algorithm if necessary
3. prevent corrupt mp3s from crashing/halting the CD burning process
4. fix the gaps on live/mix albums
When I was in a hurry, I used to use ECDC on-the-fly decoding. Unfortunately, when burning downloaded mp3s, 2 and 3 would catch me out occasionally! For this reason, it's actually quicker/easier to decode to .wav first, rather than make a coaster. If they're your mp3s, you shouldn't have problems 2 and 3.
Cheers,
David.
http://www.David.Robinson.org/ (http://www.David.Robinson.org/)
Originally posted by 2Bdecided
Re: www.mp3decoders.org (http://www.mp3decoders.org)
For the "anally retentive" kind of people who read this site, you really should be decoding to .wav separately first! I'm not saying it will sound any better, but it gives you the option to...
Cheers,
David.
http://www.David.Robinson.org/ (http://www.David.Robinson.org/)
Thank You David
My wife must be right "Anal Retentive"
A Smart man learns from his mistakes....A Wise man learns from other peoples mistakes
Just added some links to Davids post for completeness:
Originally posted by 2Bdecided
1. decode to 24-bit accuracy and dither down (e.g. use MAD)
2. check the sampling rate is correct, and use a good quality resampling algorithm if necessary
3. prevent corrupt mp3s from crashing/halting the CD burning process
4. fix the gaps on live/mix albums
When I was in a hurry, I used to use ECDC on-the-fly decoding. Unfortunately, when burning downloaded mp3s, 2 and 3 would catch me out occasionally! For this reason, it's actually quicker/easier to decode to .wav first, rather than make a coaster. If they're your mp3s, you shouldn't have problems 2 and 3.
Cheers,
David.
http://www.David.Robinson.org/ (http://www.David.Robinson.org/)
1
WinLame has MADlib build-in :
WinLame @ sourceforge (http://winlame.sourceforge.net/)
MAD:
MAD homepage (http://www.mars.org/home/rob/proj/mpeg/)
2
SSRC high quality sampling rate conversion:
Shibatch's homepage (http://shibatch.sourceforge.net/)
(Question: How good does SOX perform when it comes to resampling ?)
3
Mp3Utility can check mp3s for various kinds of errors:
Mp3Utility (http://www.geocities.com/mp3utility/)
Yeah, this is a good point. If you've got some high quality mp3s you want to decode properly before making an audio cd, make sure you're using a good decoder.
I recently wrote an article about this at:
http://www.chrismyden.com/nuke/article.php?sid=99 (http://www.chrismyden.com/nuke/article.php?sid=99)
In short, use WinAmp 2.7+ or the MAD decoder plugin for WinAmp to decode if you want great quality.
Real Jukebox and Media Jukebox use excellent decoders.
MusicMatch Jukebox and Nero both use flawed decoders.
chris
Originally posted by Daffy
I don't understand this clearly. Can you re-explain in newbie terms.
Already done :
The use of offsets (http://www.digital-inn.de/showthread.php3?threadid=4193)@EAC
It's the most relevant link, but you're free to read those ones too :
Offsets are arbitrary :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eac/message/6593 (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eac/message/6593) @EAC mailing list.
Mathematical war between Pio2001 and Matthias trying to figure out ofsets without external reference :
How to figure out your offset (http://www.digital-inn.de/showthread.php3?threadid=3079) @EAC
How to "read" your read offset with noisy CDs : How to find a reference offset (http://pageperso.aol.fr/Lyonpio2001/offset.htm) Article
Originally posted by Daffy
So you recommend we use a 0 in the read sample offset correction field in EAC?
Not really, because offset correction or not, it won't change much. I would rather recommand not to care at all.
For people accurate enough to be interested in offsets, I recommand using an accurate wav editor. I know Cool Edit, and Samplitude. I know SoundForge 4.5 isn't accurate (no vertical overzooming) but maybe SF5 is. Don't know about Wavelab.
Avoid GoldWave, Feurio, and Nero : no vertical zoom.
EAC could work, but using some tricks with the "automatic range selection" : the vertical zoom depends on the size of the wav displayed in the Window. Very unpratical, but free.
Then you can check if your wavs are properly edited. The first must begin with silence, and the start of the track must not be sudden, a little fade-in of several samples at least is needed to avoid an audible click.
This is very nit picking, but there are some CDs that begin before track 1 ! In that case, they must be corrected.
Examples, Black - Wonderful Life, and Mike Oldfield, Discovery are in this case. The track 1 starts in the pregap, and the beginning is clearly missing when the CD is played.
AmGod - Half Rotten and Decayed is a CD mastered with a huge write offset. All tracks begin before the track marker. Drive offset correction is nonsense on this CD, it's like calculating the distance between two towns to within one millimeter, while you don't even know if you're measuring from center to center or subburb to subburb, by road or by air.
For the end of last track, there is just to check that it ends with enough silence (after a tiny fade-out, like the first track begining). I recommend adding 2 seconds of digital silence at the end if there is none, it will allow about 150 generations of lossless copies without offset correction, granted the average combined offset is one sector, before the last data of the last track begins to be lost.
All these adjustments relates to offset correction in some way, and turns automatic offset correction useless.
Originally posted by Daffy
Also PIO2001, what burning software do you recommended for copying audio CDs? I value your opion. Thanks.
EAC for ripping.
For burning, well... I don't know.
All can do a perfect job since Nero 5.5.7.8. It's a matter of interface.
I liked EasyCD Creator 4, but the version I have doesn't support my burner. There was write errors sometimes (one or two different samples), but now I'll never know if it was EasyCd's fault or my old burner's fault.
I hate Nero because it inserts gaps between your wavs, and there is no way to default the pause to zero. You get a coaster each time you forget to cancel the gaps.
I can't recommend EAC because of the Lead-out issue, though maybe it's not important.
WinOnCD is discontinued.
Feurio is without doubt the best, according to what I've read. I never burned with it because the interface is too heavy.
Personally, I use Nero and EAC. I can't decide between the gap and the lead-out things.
To make compilations, I use Samplitude Producer pro, but it's not in the same price range. It's a top of the art editing, mixing and mastering program, about 1000 €.
I can but rally the general opinion about Feurio being the best. For newbies I would have recommended WinOnCD, or EasyCd creator if I had tested the last one (I had the 4) and checked that it didn't introduce write errors.
Originally posted by Pio2001
I liked EasyCD Creator 4, but the version I have doesn't support my burner. There was write errors sometimes (one or two different samples), but now I'll never know if it was EasyCd's fault or my old burner's fault.
and
....I would have recommended WinOnCD, or EasyCd creator if I had tested the last one (I had the 4) and checked that it didn't introduce write errors.
First off, all I can say is WOW! Thanks PIO2001 for such an informative post. Now, I have a question regarding your comments above on ECDC, or in general: how do you check for writer errors that you describe above? Do you use the Nero utility CD Check or something? I have ECDC 5.0 Basic that came with my Plextor 24/10/40A and I'm not sure I want to use it either because it seems like the entire community hates that product. I have been using Nero instead to make compilations, but I'm concerned about the gap issue also. On the other hand, Nero can burn *.cue sheets like EAC and other image files. ECDC can't burn *cue sheets, which sucks. How good is Easy's CD Copy? Surely it's not as good as creating an image with EAC and burning with Nero, EAC, or some other program that supports *cue sheet burning.
Personally, I think all these programs have issues....
Originally posted by Daffy
how do you check for writer errors that you describe above?
I kept the wavs that EasyCd burned, then I extracted them with EAC, and compared wavs (original vs copy). THere was one or two "different samples" in the middle of a track.
I re-extracted two other times, because with the Hitachi GD-7500, it was difficult to get a consistent result, and the same error came again at the same place (thus write error burned on the CD) while another disappeared (read error of the copy). It was n't a firmware reading bug, like the old Toshiba one, because I could also get perfect copies sometimes.
Originally posted by Daffy
I have ECDC 5.0 Basic that came with my Plextor 24/10/40A and I'm not sure I want to use it either because it seems like the entire community hates that product.
This hatred was mostly against EasyCD creator 3. It seems it replaced the Windows ASPI with Adaptec's (correct me if I'm wrong), and it has a major bug writing audio (it cut much more than one sector at the end of tracks !).
Since EasyCD creator 4 is out, I heard in forums about 5 times more complaints about Nero than about EasyCD (that is about 2 and 10 ), especially the writing bug (solved in 5.5.7.8, though undocumented), and the Nero85CD.vxd that conflicted withEAC.
Now those issues are solved in Nero 5.5.8.2. I don't think there is anything wrong left in either Nero or EasyCD.
Originally posted by Daffy
I have been using Nero instead to make compilations, but I'm concerned about the gap issue also.
Just a matter of interface : you must reset the pause to zero each time you add tracks, while EasyCD saves your preferences.
Originally posted by Daffy
How good is Easy's CD Copy? Surely it's not as good as creating an image with EAC and burning with Nero, EAC, or some other program that supports *cue sheet burning.
The issue is secure reading, you can't avoid EAC for this purpose. Cuesheet is not important. Wether you prefer burning in Nero with a cuesheet or in EasyCD appending tracks is a matter of taste, granted the tracks were extracted with EAC in secure mode.
Originally posted by Daffy
Personally, I think all these programs have issues....
I don't recall having heard of any issue with Feurio, is there ?
Originally posted by Pio2001
Cuesheet is not important. Wether you prefer burning in Nero with a cuesheet or in EasyCD appending tracks is a matter of taste, granted the tracks were extracted with EAC in secure mode.
Well, I suppose you can run into problems on Live CDs or other CDs where some songs are continuous, although the change to a different track (i.e. no gap). The best way to copy these CDs is as an image, correct? If so, I won't be able to use EasyCD because it doesn't copy EAC's secure images. I would have to put my faith in Easy's extraction methods and hope it doesn't introduce errors. Or could I still extract track by track with EAC and then make a compilation with EasyCD with 0 second gap and not hear clicks?
BTW, thanks for you comments.
NTI nag screens and backgrounds:
I hate them too...
I eliminated the nag screen...and I changed the landscapes by gray bmp's...
I always burn my cds in DAO mode (data & audio).
And I dont like go higher than 4x for audio. (I think because of this, I never had a single click, skip or pop in ALL my CDA "copies" and they play flawless...!
For extraction: EAC/secure, after a good cd cleaning and a cold boot.
Um grande abraco,
LIF
Thanks for the hints.
BTW: for the record: Brazil Rules.
Abraço;
Roberto.
Originally posted by Daffy
Well, I suppose you can run into problems on Live CDs or other CDs where some songs are continuous,
No, nothing to fear. The only case I can think of would be performing a test and copy selected tracks (no possible sync between track) with a non accurate stream drive. There, yes, you'd need either to copy image twice and compare them (if you want the added safety of test and copy that made you loose the sync between track in the previous sentence), either copy selected tracks and keep the log with all CRC for comparison with another copy selected tracks.
No problem if your drive has accurate stream. You can copy selected tracks, or test and copy selected tracks, then append them in EasyCD.
[edit]You can also just copy selected tracks (no test) with a non accurate drive without danger, as long as you have the "sync between ttracks" option checked. It checks that there is no problem at the track transition.[/edit]
Originally posted by Daffy
I would have to put my faith in Easy's extraction methods and hope it doesn't introduce errors.
Don't you dare :eek: !
Hi Guys
Does Nero do the following, normalisation before burning?
from *.cda RIPING & NORMALISE get *.wav
from *.wav BURN get *.cda on a new cd
Thanks guys
Originally posted by LIF
NTI nag screens and backgrounds:
I hate them too...
I eliminated the nag screen...and I changed the landscapes by gray bmp's...
I always burn my cds in DAO mode (data & audio).
With my Plextor burner+ NTI, I usually burn data in TAO, with "close session and disc" selected. It's the same thing I think, except that the TOC is written at the end rather than the beginning of the process. With audio though, I usually use DAO (unless pauses between tracks are desirable for some reason).
There's a bug in the most recent NTI with my Plextor drive with *CD-RW's* specifically, when I try burning data discs in DAO mode. The write goes fine, but the program hangs at the end.... that's why I use TAO with "close session/disc" instead, it seems to avoid problems and works just as well.
P.S... what "nag screen" is this? Using a non-retail version of NTI, by any chance?
Originally posted by rjamorim
BTW: for the record: Brazil Rules.
Abraço;
Roberto.
You got bragging rights thats for sure
Originally posted by smg
You got bragging rights thats for sure
Thanks.
But let's wait for Sunday (Or Saturday, depending on your time zone)
Originally posted by rjamorim
Yes. And decode with a good decoder, like Winamp, mpg123 or mad.
Roberto.
Or just Win32LAME = LAME + RazorLame, very easy to use & flawless decoding.
Originally posted by KikeG
Or just Win32LAME = LAME + RazorLame, very easy to use & flawless decoding.
LAME uses the mpg123 decoder (mpglib)
You guys don't like CDRWin?
Originally posted by rjamorim
LAME uses the mpg123 decoder (mpglib)
ehmmm.... didn't know, sorry
Originally posted by redsandvb
You guys don't like CDRWin?
I have version 3.8
For data, it is always possible to drag and drop directories, but it's nowhere close to Nero or EasyCD interface.
For audio, it works well and supports EAC cuesheets. But when I want to append track, it doesn't correct Windows bug and swaps 1st/last. Then it's a pain to have them back in the right order.
I have usually no use of it, I burn audio and data with Nero (yes I've decided myself for Nero, since it seems to support my burner better than EAC (Yamaha CRW3200e VK)).
I didn't try with latest Nero, but I still keep CDRWin at hand because it's the only program I've got that can overburn data after an audio session.
I often need it, since my external ADC supports only 48 kHz recording (or 32 kHz), so when I copy vinyls to CDR, I burn an audio session with the recordings converted to 44.1 kHz, then a data session with Monkey's audio 48 kHz files. In this case, Nero never accepted to overburn the APEs files if they were a little too big. But no problem with CDRWin.