Text only | Text with Images

HydrogenAudio

Hosted Forums => foobar2000 => 3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) => Topic started by: vader897 on 2006-05-02 14:10:21

Poll
Question: Which componant do you most want ported to Foobar 0.9?
Option 1: foo_dirwatch votes: 3
Option 2: foo_out_dsound_ex2 votes: 6
Option 3: foo_scheduler votes: 4
Option 4: foo_uie_search votes: 4
Option 5: foo_uie_tabs votes: 16
Option 6: OTHER votes: 20
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: vader897 on 2006-05-02 14:10:21
This is kind of an excuse to start a poll to try it out but I thought it was a good idea and the results should be interesting.

I know I have left out alot of plugins but I could only list so many. 
I will admit that I am biased about the plugins listed (in no particular order) but if your preference isnt there dont hesitate to vote 'other'. Hopefully I managed to pick the few that people are most hanging out for, if not then we can expect 'other' to dominant.

This thread isnt supposed to be promoting 'me too, me too' behavior but should enable anxious foobar 0.9 users to get it out of the system as well as provide some feedback to users, developers and just everybody interested.

Have a good one.
  -Vader897
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: miken on 2006-05-02 14:20:01
OTHER -> skip silence or something similar
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: lextune on 2006-05-02 14:40:01
foo_uie_tabs, FTW!
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: Bachi-Bouzouk on 2006-05-02 15:58:49
Other :skip silence too.

even if uie tabs would be really great
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: Scidd0w on 2006-05-02 16:04:15
other -> foo_pod
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: Thundik81 on 2006-05-02 16:07:01
Other - foo_soundtouch
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: Stuart60611 on 2006-05-02 16:48:10
tabs and project m panel.
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: Zurman on 2006-05-02 16:55:31
Voted uie_tabs, even though I still lack far too many plugins to switch to 0.9.1 (like input_ym, quicktag, scheduler, uie_quicksearch, playcount, ...)
btw, what is uie_search ?
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: Neil K on 2006-05-02 16:58:15
foo_pod every single time.
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: randal1013 on 2006-05-02 17:04:13
i want/need skip control.
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: mobyduck on 2006-05-02 17:52:31
Quote from: Neil K on
foo_pod every single time.
Same here.

Alessandro
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: spex04 on 2006-05-02 18:37:39
OTHER > foo_playlistfind
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: pnjman on 2006-05-02 18:39:24
Other - Foo_pod
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: zmur on 2006-05-02 18:50:17
other: foo_quicktag and/or  some kind of plugin to play .wma
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: Seldaek on 2006-05-02 18:55:37
zmur, read the news (http://www.foobar2000.org/changelog.html). WMA is supported.
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: JEdwardP on 2006-05-02 19:07:52
As much as I depend on the scheduler plug-in (that's what usually shuts my machine down at night), an update to which is coming, of course, I need an updated input plug-in for speex even more. I've got several dozens of audiobooks, the majority of which I encoded in speex.

Jim
Title: Which componant do you want in fbar 0.9 the most.
Post by: foosion on 2006-05-02 19:18:30
This poll is useless as one would have to go through the entire thread to know which is the most wanted component, and there are already better organized threads to collect information about desired and finished component ports.

Topic closed.
Text only | Text with Images