1
Notice
Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
2
General Audio / Re: Another audiophile "expert"
Last post by jaro1 -I've found this YT channel of an audiophile "expert": https://www.youtube.com/c/TheHansBeekhuyzenChannel
Two examples:
The magic audiophile switch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Io4SDi5hLxs
The audio network filter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sDiHFYHKij4
Enjoy
It's fascinating how the gentleman in the video, considering his age, talks about improving stereo separation, sibilance or sound relaxation...
And if he didn't perceive it that way himself and has it "second hand", then it's even more fascinating..
3
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: JScript Panel
Last post by marc2k3 -https://github.com/jscript-panel/release/releases
https://jscript-panel.github.io/docs/changes/
4
General Audio / Re: Another audiophile "expert"
Last post by fooball -Pointless word salad above, do you know that once clipping happens in fixed integer domain you get distortions?Hahahahaha
What you've not done is provide an example of such a thing happening. That's my point.
Your sig says you want your account deleted. Stop using it.
5
General Audio / Re: Replay gain not working properly, audio levels are not norlamized
Last post by fooball -I usually listen to whole albums, so i thought the album mode made senseThat's as may be, but then all the tracks get adjusted by the same amount and therefore there will be quiet tracks and loud ones. If you want to "normalise" all the tracks, use per-track ReplayGain.
6
FLAC / Re: FLAC-git Releases (Code Base v1.4.x)
Last post by Replica9000 -Linux static binaries
- Built with GCC 12.3.0
- i386, amd64, armv7 & armv8
7
General Audio / Re: Another audiophile "expert"
Last post by Wombat -8
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by Wombat -
9
General Audio / Re: Another audiophile "expert"
Last post by mycroft -Perhaps you can suggest a situation where the sort of thing people are likely to do in SoX (or whatever) will exceed 32-bit processing. I can understand needing some headroom in the processing chain over the 16 bits of CD-quality, and I can understand that 64 bits provides a much greater dynamic range, but is that amount of dynamic range ever actually necessary? You can simultaneously mix 65,536 individual 16-bit sources in 32 bits, and that would be one heck of a sound stage. Can you tell the difference in a blind listening test between 32-bit processing and 24-bit processing, let alone 64-bits vs 32-bits?
It's a more intelligent approach to understand how much resource is required and only throw that much at it. Just because you "can" doesn't mean you "have to", and being disparaging about other users' choices is narrow-minded and insulting.
Pointless word salad above, do you know that once clipping happens in fixed integer domain you get distortions?
10
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by Replica9000 -flac git-cfe3afca (2024-05-16)
"Further improve calculation of when to use wide residual computation"
Code: [Select]
1 thread 4 threads 8 threads
-5 0m13.561s 0m4.579s 0m4.598s
-5p 0m23.162s 0m7.237s 0m5.396s
-8 0m37.276s 0m11.841s 0m7.287s
-8p 2m52.772s 0m57.365s 0m36.769s