Un-compressing music
Reply #9 – 2004-05-26 16:03:20
is this true? They compress the sound so that it can be made louder, and sound better to idiots? (jimhaddon) Yes, that's the damn truth. It took me at least one year or so (I didn't know anything about HA.) to fully realize this issue; the truth is really painful. And almost all people in the world are these idiots. I believe that compressed audio can be broadcast more efficently than uncompressed. I am not an engineer but I do remember reading an article a long time ago in AUDIO that said that. (boojum) The only thinkable sense of compression/limiting: When lowering the available dynamic range, that might be sensible, for example going from 32bit to 16bit, recording from CD to analogue tape or broadcasting. The available dynamics of FM broadcasting are surely not more than 45 dB (foot- and headroom and usable dynamics). There might be some classical recordings that exceed this dynamic range. So the decrease in sound quality (less dynamics) equals the increase (a higher signal-to-noise ratio). FireStarter, I don't care about late replies; I like to get replies at all, maybe a year later.In theory expansion with the exact contrary settings to the previous compression can reverse the previous compression. The problem is to find out the settings of the compression. Yes, but as I've already said before, in most cases it seems that infinite limiting ratios are applied. You can't reverse that process.