11
Notice
Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
12
General - (fb2k) / attach pictures on-line in foobar2000
Last post by damians -13
Validated News / Re: freedb.dbpoweramp.com/~cddb/cddb.cgi
Last post by NetRanger -14
Lossless / Other Codecs / Re: Tested: Lossless decoding speed, multithreaded - and fast verification
Last post by bryant -@bryant on WavPack:I believe, based on my experiments, that FFmpeg -threads <n> specifies the total number of threads to use, which is identical to WavPack’s interpretation.
Whether wvunpack --threads=<N> vs ffmpeg -threads=<N> is apples to apples ... I don't know. It might be "better" than comparing wvunpack --threads vs ffmpeg (spawning all), and all I could do was to get it down to thread count matters enough to tilt the numbers.
When specifying nothing (option alone) WavPack simply defaults to 5 threads (a good compromise on all machines, if not necessarily the fastest). FFmpeg either determines the number of physical threads and uses that (my guess), or uses unlimited threads (like “make”). The option is there to limit the use of threading only.
Another difference is specifying zero; FFmpeg ignores this (I guess it's the default) whereas WavPack disallows it.
15
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by Wombat -16
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by Replica9000 -17
3rd Party Plugins - (fb2k) / Re: Dynamic Range plugin
Last post by francesco -even it's very old topic
I would like too have this plugins in 64bit architetture
i'm using on 32bit , but in v2 it doesn't write in the tag , even in the advance settings i have enable to write to the tag
I will try on v1 ,last 32bit vesion
the last version i have is foo_dynamic_range_1.1.12
foo_dynamic_range.dll
Code: [Select]
SHA-256: A432405F4D7367246A43B4CAE6C766FD223D96A2BF8C38A3BB5AAF45B0C05248is a bug?
thanks
18
FLAC / Re: FLAC v1.4.x Performance Tests
Last post by Wombat -19
Lossless / Other Codecs / Re: HALAC (High Availability Lossless Audio Compression)
Last post by Porcus -My idea was more, if one wants to throw a bone to those who want a lossy version of HALAC - then making for it to work with LossyWAV would enable those users to work out settings at their preferred bit rates and see how it compares to other compressors.
Since the compression part is lossless (the lossiness is in the LossyWAV pre-processor), there would be no considerations about audio quality between compressors - speed and size would still be comparable in an apples to apples way.
20
Site Related Discussion / Re: Please remove my account
Last post by Porcus -I would suggest that users rather put effort into constructively rectify whatever "disinformation propaganda" be posted, rather than this ritual whining - after all, @mycroft being present on the forum has led to fast code fixes that would otherwise be subject to a bigger bureaucracy - but that is just another opinion of mine, that is pretty much orthogonal to whatever rights a user has to divorce the forum.