Ah, what the heck. I was curious.
I found the following correlations by listener, and sorted from most to least correlation (I am listener 6):
listener r
6 0.87
20 0.79
17 0.74
1 0.71
34 0.67
13 0.67
7 0.63
30 0.60
15 0.58
37 0.56
11 0.54
41 0.54
35 0.45
9 0.43
16 0.42
10 0.38
4 0.30
18 0.29
39 0.08
2 0.06
14 0.05
38 0.02
25 -0.01
23 -0.07
36 -0.12
29 -0.17
32 -0.56
28 -0.56
If I choose only the 18 listeners with at least weak positive correlation (including listener 18), I get the following results:
mpc dm-std dm-xtrm dm-ins cbr256 abr224 r3mix cbr192
4.76 4.63 4.49 4.38 4.36 4.29 4.27 3.81
Unadjusted p-values
dm-std dm-xtrm dm-ins cbr256 abr224 r3mix cbr192
mpc 0.379 0.068 0.010* 0.007* 0.002* 0.001* 0.000*
dm-std - 0.339 0.087 0.062 0.021* 0.015* 0.000*
dm-xtrm - - 0.444 0.359 0.169 0.137 0.000*
dm-ins - - - 0.878 0.540 0.467 0.000*
cbr256 - - - - 0.646 0.566 0.000*
abr224 - - - - - 0.908 0.001*
r3mix - - - - - - 0.002*
Each '.' is 1,000 resamples. Each '+' is 10,000 resamples
.........+
Adjusted p-values
dm-std dm-xtrm dm-ins cbr256 abr224 r3mix cbr192
mpc 0.924 0.459 0.120 0.087 0.025* 0.020* 0.000*
dm-std - 0.931 0.522 0.445 0.203 0.166 0.000*
dm-xtrm - - 0.922 0.922 0.724 0.660 0.000*
dm-ins - - - 0.985 0.922 0.922 0.003*
cbr256 - - - - 0.941 0.922 0.005*
abr224 - - - - - 0.985 0.021*
r3mix - - - - - - 0.027*
ff123