Skip to main content

Topic: Looking for Burrrn Alternative (Read 8758 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
  • ExUser
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Read-only
Looking for Burrrn Alternative
Reply #25
I guess I'm wrong about dealing with non-compliant CUEs. Shows you how often I deal with them. My approach is not perfect, no, it's just the least worst solution I've found. Do what you will.

  • greynol
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
Looking for Burrrn Alternative
Reply #26
foobar2000 will translate non-compliant to compliant.

So this isn't true?
Is 24-bit/192kHz good enough for your lo-fi vinyl, or do you need 32/384?

  • ExUser
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Read-only
Looking for Burrrn Alternative
Reply #27
I'd need a test case, which I lack on my work PC. My claim and trout's are mutually-exclusive. I haven't explicitly tested non-compliant CUEs in forever. He very well might be right.
  • Last Edit: 01 August, 2012, 01:16:27 PM by Canar

  • greynol
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
Looking for Burrrn Alternative
Reply #28
When he says 0.9, he means 0.9.0.  I am still running 0.9.4 and it chokes on non-compliant cue sheets.
Is 24-bit/192kHz good enough for your lo-fi vinyl, or do you need 32/384?