Skip to main content

Topic: Rarewares "Oggenc2.85using aoTuVb5.7" vs. venc.exe "aoT (Read 3204 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • mzso
  • [*][*][*][*]
Rarewares "Oggenc2.85using aoTuVb5.7" vs. venc.exe "aoT
Did a conversion with both with the same settings but the results are different. Aren't they supposed to be the same since they oggenc uses aoTuVb5.7?

Edit: Didn't expect the title to be truncated without a notice. Originally the title was: "Rarewares "Oggenc2.85using aoTuVb5.7" vs. venc.exe "aoTuV Beta 5.7" different results"
  • Last Edit: 05 October, 2010, 09:57:17 AM by mzso

  • Yirkha
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • FB2K Moderator
Rarewares "Oggenc2.85using aoTuVb5.7" vs. venc.exe "aoT
Reply #1
How much different is different? When dealing with lossy codecs using complex math, even a different compiler or its settings can result in tiny changes in the output file.
Full-quoting makes you scroll past the same junk over and over.

  • mzso
  • [*][*][*][*]
Rarewares "Oggenc2.85using aoTuVb5.7" vs. venc.exe "aoT
Reply #2
How much different is different? When dealing with lossy codecs using complex math, even a different compiler or its settings can result in tiny changes in the output file.

I don't know. I just used foobars's bitcompare tool, which told me that the differences start at 0.4687755 s. I also looked at them with TC's bitcompare tool but that didn't help much since the length is a little bit different, I'm guessing different metadata. But the data seems to start and end the same bits by looking at them.
What better tool could I compare them?
  • Last Edit: 05 October, 2010, 05:54:26 PM by mzso