foo_abx 1.3.4 reportfoobar2000 v0.9.6.92009/09/14 16:25:29File A: C:\MULTI\15 Since Always Stereo Loss\SinceAlways.wavFile B: C:\MULTI\15 Since Always Stereo Loss\SinceAlways.mp416:25:29 : Test started.16:25:40 : 01/01 50.0%16:25:44 : 02/02 25.0%16:25:47 : 03/03 12.5%16:25:51 : 04/04 6.3%16:25:55 : 05/05 3.1%16:25:57 : Test finished. ---------- Total: 5/5 (3.1%)
Personnaly I would have liked to see Nero LC-AAC 80Kbps just for my own curiosity.I am convinced that nero lc beats Aotuv b5.7 on the whole bitrates range, but I would have liked to see how it deals with Itunes which is a codec I never use & also see the opinion of someone else on nero lc vs. aotuv (afterall maybe you would prefer aotuv which would be a surprise to me).Low bitrate is not my personnal area of interest, but it was nice to read anyway.It seems to give some favor to Itunes LC AAC but without Nero LC AAC, I fell it's incomplete IMHO.
Thanks for your work, IgorC! It's interesting to see that on average, you prefer AAC LC over HE-AAC even at 80kbps.
Awesome test!Seems like LAME sill struggles greatly with the harpicods on Slayer's Spill The Blood. Or is it a different track with the same name?
Great work. I enjoy reading your tests.What I'd like to see is Coding Technologies' (Winamp) HE-AAC encoder thrown in there. It always gets left out of the AAC discussion.
... mp3 is the high anchor, it is a reference not a competitor.