Skip to main content

Topic: Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release (Read 10515 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • muaddib
  • [*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
There were some complaints from user on HA about August version of Nero AAC encoder quality compared to February 2007 release.
But there were not much samples provided to back this up. Namely only guruboolez provided one sample. guruboolez is unfortunately not available since beginning of this year.
Can you please help us providing more examples where it is easily noticeable that February version produces worse results than the August one. Also please point me to any thread that I missed where such sample was provided.
Please provide very short samples (5-15 seconds) where the problem is evident, together with parameters used for encoding.
This information is needed to improve next release of Nero AAC encoder, so if you are interested in improving the quality please help us.

  • Squeller
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #1
I'm glad to see you're still working on the encoder. I'm very interested in the quality of the encoder. I reported this problem, but this is not august/february related. Maybe it's already solved, according to menno in that thread.

  • muaddib
  • [*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #2
I'm glad to see you're still working on the encoder. I'm very interested in the quality of the encoder. I reported this problem, but this is not august/february related. Maybe it's already solved, according to menno in that thread.

This problem is solved, but we will not release encoder until we are sure that it doesn't introduce new problems and that is why users help is needed. To help us we need only samples that introduced new problems in August release compared to February release.

  • eevan
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #3
Here is my sample.
It is 9.887s long opening of „Flos florum", a motet by Guillaume Dufay.

Files in the archive http://rapidshare.com/files/96827886/flos.rar (3152 KB):
  • flos-orig.ape
  • flos-august.mp4 (neroaacenc.exe 1.1.34.2 -q 0.45)
  • flos-february.mp4 (neroaacenc.exe 1.0.7.0 -q 0.45)
  • flos-august.png (Adobe Audition screenshots showing the problem…
  • flos-february.png …and the difference in the two builds)
I hope it's helpful!
If age or weaknes doe prohibyte bloudletting you must use boxing

  • muaddib
  • [*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #4
  • flos-august.png (Adobe Audition screenshots showing the problem…
  • flos-february.png …and the difference in the two builds)

Thank you very much for this contribution. However graphs are not needed.
Additional information that is needed is what difference do you hear? At which position?
We will not try to make graphs look better, we will try new version of the encoder to sound better (by making it have less differences from original that could be heard).

  • eevan
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #5
Of course, I know that the graphs aren't proving anything.
There is a problem in the syllable 'flo' of the word 'florum' (6–8s).

Code: [Select]
foo_abx 1.3.1 report
foobar2000 v0.9.5.1 beta 1
2008/03/04 12:09:58

File A: D:\TEMP\Tmp\flos-february.mp4
File B: D:\TEMP\Tmp\flos-august.mp4

12:09:58 : Test started.
12:10:10 : 01/01  50.0%
12:10:40 : 02/02  25.0%
12:11:15 : 03/03  12.5%
12:12:18 : 03/04  31.3%
12:13:08 : 04/05  18.8%
12:13:44 : 05/06  10.9%
12:14:30 : 06/07  6.3%
12:15:06 : 07/08  3.5%
12:15:49 : 07/09  9.0%
12:16:05 : 08/10  5.5%
12:16:46 : 09/11  3.3%
12:17:22 : 10/12  1.9%
12:18:08 : 11/13  1.1%
12:18:39 : 11/14  2.9%
12:19:02 : 12/15  1.8%
12:19:45 : 13/16  1.1%
12:20:02 : Test finished.

----------
Total: 13/16 (1.1%)
  • Last Edit: 04 March, 2008, 12:48:33 PM by eevan
If age or weaknes doe prohibyte bloudletting you must use boxing

  • muaddib
  • [*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #6
Thank you eeven!
The problem in the syllable 'flo' of the word 'florum' (6–8s) definitely exists, but is very subtle. I can not hear it, but I got confirmation from colleague, that has better hearing, that there is a subtle problem in February version.
This sample is definitely not an example of "easily noticeable", but it will be taken into account before next release.

Anybody else to provide a sample?

  • muaddib
  • [*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #7
Would anybody with good pair of ears (capable of hearing small impairments:)) compare Feb and Aug version on famous bibilolo sample? Maybe check background noise from 4.5s to 7.5s 
Thanx in advance.

Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #8
I could give it a try although I am not sure if I am able to hear anything.
  • Last Edit: 25 March, 2008, 04:20:14 PM by Sebastian Mares

  • IgorC
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #9
Would anybody with good pair of ears (capable of hearing small impairments:)) compare Feb and Aug version on famous bibilolo sample? Maybe check background noise from 4.5s to 7.5s 
Thanx in advance.


If you will upload some encododed samples to abx some people will help you here (including me) 

  • muaddib
  • [*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #10
bibilolo sample

Original can be downloaded from http://www.mp3-tech.org/tests/aac_48/samples/sample3.zip
(There is original in flac and some compressed formats inside zip)

Here is the sample encoded at 96kbps:
February version: [ Specified attachment is not available ] August version: [ Specified attachment is not available ]

  • Alexxander
  • [*][*][*][*]
Comparing August and February Nero AAC Encoder release
Reply #11
bibilolo sample

Original can be downloaded from http://www.mp3-tech.org/tests/aac_48/samples/sample3.zip
(There is original in flac and some compressed formats inside zip)

Here is the sample encoded at 96kbps:
February version: (Attachment Link) August version: (Attachment Link)

I've ABX'ed both mp4 against flac with Sennheiser headphone, cheap Sony amp and analogue out of onboard ADI1988B soundchip. If one listens to a small sound fading in at around 5.9-6.0 sec ABXing is very easy. I had really no problem matching samples so I quitted after 5 and 6 times. But I can say that v1.1.34 does the job much better than v1.0.7 (less distortion of that specific upcoming sound at around 5.9 sec).

Code: [Select]
foo_abx 1.3.1 report
foobar2000 v0.9.5.1
2008/03/26 15:25:10

File A: C:\Documents and Settings\Alexxander\Escritorio\bibilolo.flac
File B: C:\Documents and Settings\Alexxander\Escritorio\bibilolo__1.0.7_.mp4

15:25:10 : Test started.
15:25:47 : 01/01  50.0%
15:25:54 : 02/02  25.0%
15:26:00 : 03/03  12.5%
15:26:06 : 04/04  6.3%
15:26:14 : 05/05  3.1%
15:26:17 : Test finished.

----------
Total: 5/5 (3.1%)


Code: [Select]
foo_abx 1.3.1 report
foobar2000 v0.9.5.1
2008/03/26 15:26:46

File A: C:\Documents and Settings\Alexxander\Escritorio\bibilolo.flac
File B: C:\Documents and Settings\Alexxander\Escritorio\bibilolo__1.1.34_.mp4

15:26:46 : Test started.
15:27:08 : 01/01  50.0%
15:27:23 : 02/02  25.0%
15:27:30 : 03/03  12.5%
15:27:51 : 04/04  6.3%
15:28:02 : 05/05  3.1%
15:28:15 : 06/06  1.6%
15:28:16 : Test finished.

----------
Total: 6/6 (1.6%)