Skip to main content

Topic: Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92 (Read 24252 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • Lev
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
oops, I always thought I had been using 3.90.2, but upon actually opening my eyes and checking, it seems I am using 3.92.  I have swapped to 3.90.2, although I cannot tell one little difference whatsoever.

Is there any difference, audibly?

  • RIV@NVX
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #1
3.92 is newer, 3.90.2 is older... I don't know about difference.

  • dev0
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #2
There should be no audible difference, but maybe a small one in bitrate, since 3.92 uses different compilerflags.

dev0
"To understand me, you'll have to swallow a world." Or maybe your words.

Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #3
Apparently the developpers have screwed something up; 3.92 and later I believe use the wrong noiseshaping with APS.

I personally would recommend 3.90.2 for the VBR presets, and 3.93.1 for the ABR & CBR presets.

  • Gabriel
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #4
Quote
Apparently the developpers have screwed something up; 3.92 and later I believe use the wrong noiseshaping with APS.
???

  • Lev
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #5
What does the '???' mean?

Wrong noise shaping or not?

I know that the newer compiles of Lame have 'disadvantaged' APS...

  • Daffy
  • [*][*][*]
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #6
Quote
Apparently the developpers have screwed something up; 3.92 and later I believe use the wrong noiseshaping with APS.

I personally would recommend 3.90.2 for the VBR presets, and 3.93.1 for the ABR & CBR presets.

You state 3.92 and later is screwed up (without backing that up, btw), and then recommend 3.93.1.  Isn't 3.93.1 later than 3.92?

Clarify your claims please.

EDIT:  My mistake.  I now see you recommend 3.93.1 for ABR and CBR.  However, I disagree with your claim that 3.92 APS is screwed up.
  • Last Edit: 16 January, 2003, 11:26:39 AM by Daffy

  • Gabriel
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #7
Noise shaping is the same between 3.90.2, 3.91, 3.92, 3.93.1.

  • LordofStars
  • [*][*][*][*]
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #8
'tis only 3.93 that comes unreccomended.
r3mix zealot.

  • dev0
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
Lame 3.90.2 vs 3.92
Reply #9
We've been through this so many times...
The differences between 3.90.2 and 3.92 are:
- changed compiler options, that might cause a slight modification in bitrate;
- support for CBR/ABR alt-presets for bitrates <80kbps

3.90.2 is still the HA approved, most tested and fastest version, so if you don't need any of the 'features' of 3.92 or 3.93.1 use it!

dev0
"To understand me, you'll have to swallow a world." Or maybe your words.