....Anyway, I think our current non-SSE build is faster than the old SSE build.
Quote from: Maurits on 15 August, 2007, 04:38:39 PMAs there is a Linux version now, would it be difficult to get it to run on OS X?That is probably as easy as getting an OS X development machine here... so I can try, but I don't promise anything
As there is a Linux version now, would it be difficult to get it to run on OS X?
Is it legally ok to package this for Linux distros, think an rpm package?
This License does not provide any rights to reproduce and/or distribute this software package in whole or in any part.
No unfortunately, the next release will have huge (because there is room for that ) improvements for multichannel support.
Actually, for this release we do use the Intel compiler. I didn't know about this issue, will be better for next release.Anyway, I think our current non-SSE build is faster than the old SSE build.
Does this mean that we should use non-SSE version though our CPUs support SSE?
Anyway, I think our current non-SSE build is faster than the old SSE build.
Great with a linux-version. Thanks a bushel.But could we get a linux-version of the tagger too?
Quote from: yalelynn on 18 August, 2007, 09:15:11 AMDoes this mean that we should use non-SSE version though our CPUs support SSE?QuoteAnyway, I think our current non-SSE build is faster than the old SSE build.
Thank you very much for the Linux release, but I have to second that request. At the moment, I have to turn to wine+Nero's tagger for tagging my mp4 files. Or does anyone have any other mp4-tagging solution handy for Kubuntu 6.10 Edgy? (Amarok supposedly does it, but I couldn't get my self-compiled sources to run, nor does my distro package offer the feature) I hope it's not too much trouble to compile the tagger likewise for Linux...
And yes, I also second the request for a Linux command line tagger that could be used in conjunction with certain ripping GUIs, like K3b, KAudioCreator or rubyripper.
Well, what exactly is the problem that prevents you from successfully compiling the Amarok sources?
But someone have found bugs in SSE version,and we do'nt know if quality comes under the influence of these bugs.In another word,Will SSE version and non-SSE come about the files of same quality?
mp4tags from the MPEG4IP package or AtomicParsley (SVN version)...
or if anyone can point me to repositories holding the newest Amarok with mp4-tagging support, I can install them as well
A new version of the Nero Digital Audio+ package has been released on http://www.nerodigital.com/The package can be downloaded here: http://www.nero.com/nerodigital/eng/down-ndaudio.php
Haven't been successful concerning this one so far, but there's a package of EasyTag compiled with AAC support (easytag-aac) over at http://debian-multimedia.org. The repositories can be found on the site, the GPG key is here.Edit: Medibuntu offers Amarok 1.4.5 packages for Edgy. Maybe even one with the desired MP4 tag reading/writing support, since they state that their repository includes packages that aren't part of Ubuntu for legal reasons.
On thing, though: the license file says that no redistribution is allowed. How paranoid should I be regarding this?
I use the easytag-aac package from Christian Marillat (which is quite responsive, BTW) all the time under a Debian with an old Duron 600MHz and I have no problems with it.