it's not wide screen, as much as 1024 x 768 is ... is like setting the with for a 640x480 screen, you don't do that.
Sorry, I got your res mixed up with 1600x1050 (or whatever it is...). Either way though, you don't want 1200 px lines of text. People would never read text with lines that long.
Happens with IE, indeed. With Firefox, the menu is OK.
Quote from: Sebastian Mares on 09 June, 2007, 02:10:13 AMHappens with IE, indeed. With Firefox, the menu is OK.Interesting. Is that IE7 or 6?
All links to the CoolEdit/Audition plugins seem to have gone the way of the dodo bird. Will they be making a return? I'd sure miss 'em!
Why are the Vorbis Lancer builds gone? Isn't that the 'best', easiest to use Ogg Vorbis encoder out there?The old page looked heaps better but the menu's are a big improvement now. Good work guys.- Spike
Quote from: Curtor on 09 June, 2007, 01:06:12 AMAll links to the CoolEdit/Audition plugins seem to have gone the way of the dodo bird. Will they be making a return? I'd sure miss 'em!You'll find them under the LAME and OggVorbis Library tags. I can understand why they're there, but I can also understand some confusion in trying to find them!
Yeah, but let's wait and see if some HA members suggest other colour schemes...
Quote from: rjamorim on 06 June, 2007, 10:18:33 AMYeah, but let's wait and see if some HA members suggest other colour schemes...Well, noone here bothered suggesting changes. Fortunately, my good old friend Iain "Mac" Staffell stepped up and produced this:http://wogone.com/rwg.pngWhat do you guys think?
You hurt me roberto... I did suggested a black background
I've seen the new layout for the first time today. It's different, but I like it; even the default colour scheme. My favourite scheme is probably "Grey n red". Navigation is a lot better now. No problem now to tell even a newbie "Go to rarewares.org and grab the latest oggenc". Nice!Contrary to the about page's claim The code is not completely valid, though. Sometimes standalone tags like <br> or <img> are closed with a slash: <br />. While this is required in XHTML it's invalid in HTML. On all pages I checked there's a handful of those errors. But that's it and that means tremendously better code than the majority of websites. Solid work!