Skip to main content
Topic: Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test (Read 17676 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Here are the final results for the IS/PNS 80 kbps LC AAC listening test:

http://www.audiocoding.com/results/image003.gif

http://www.audiocoding.com/results/image004.gif

Since the main reason for this test was to determine whether PNS and/or IS gives any advantage, results where only low anchor was identified were not counted.

Chunky was used with option -p 0.05 to remove results with a wrong grading.

Key, encoders used, results used and ratings are in FinalResults.zip.

Results that were not used because no relevance for this test are in NotUsed.zip.

Thanks to everyone who helped us with this test!

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #1
So, would you conclude there is no reason to use either IS or PNS or both at bitrates as high as 80kbps in your codec?
Every night with my star friends / We eat caviar and drink champagne
Sniffing in the VIP area / We talk about Frank Sinatra
Do you know Frank Sinatra? / He's dead

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #2
Yes, the results show that our current implementation of IS and PNS have no benefit over not using it. Given the cons of using these tools (read: iPod can't decode it properly) it is probably not a good idea to enable them.

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #3
Yes, the results show that our current implementation of IS and PNS have no benefit over not using it. Given the cons of using these tools (read: iPod can't decode it properly) it is probably not a good idea to enable them.

OK. Are you thinking of enhancing the current implementation or starting a new listening test at a lower bitrate to determine the threshold?

I agree on the cons, try to keep it LC as much as possible/desirable.
Every night with my star friends / We eat caviar and drink champagne
Sniffing in the VIP area / We talk about Frank Sinatra
Do you know Frank Sinatra? / He's dead


Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #5
I agree on the cons, try to keep it LC as much as possible/desirable.

According to FCD 14496-3 IS and PNS are part of the MPEG4 "AAC low complexity" profile.

The test results are interesting. All confidence intervals overlap so you can't say for certain that one setting performs better than another. I guess it's just trading different kinds of artefacts for Ahead's current implementation. I wonder if there's room for improvement. I expected the IS / PNS tools to be more useful, actually.

Cheers!
SG

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #6
Would LC even make sense at a lower bitrate?

I personally wouldn't think so especially if PS/INS cause compatibility problems.  Not even sure what players can decode LC-PS/INS but not HE.  Rockbox?

Thanks for posting the results, menno.  Glad I could help a little.

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #7
Would LC even make sense at a lower bitrate?


Why not if you have a device which supports only LC and quality is acceptable? It is always better to have more songs on a device

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #8
Sort of reminds me of all those people who wanted to encode to mp3pro when it came out at 128 Kbps or above...

About the ipod, are there patent fees for decoding PNS / IS?

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #9
About the ipod, are there patent fees for decoding PNS / IS?


Nothing extra, if you have an AAC license you can do PNS and IS, it's part of LC AAC.

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #10

About the ipod, are there patent fees for decoding PNS / IS?


Nothing extra, if you have an AAC license you can do PNS and IS, it's part of LC AAC.

If it is more complex to decode it may be a battery issue.
Every night with my star friends / We eat caviar and drink champagne
Sniffing in the VIP area / We talk about Frank Sinatra
Do you know Frank Sinatra? / He's dead

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #11


About the ipod, are there patent fees for decoding PNS / IS?


Nothing extra, if you have an AAC license you can do PNS and IS, it's part of LC AAC.

If it is more complex to decode it may be a battery issue.


If it was intentional, it wouldn't sound like it does now.

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #12
Complexity should actually decrease for IS as less MDCT data should be decoded

Same goes for PNS, too.

I wouldn't go into speculating why Apple iPod has no PNS support, but my best guess would be that it was just not tested because iTunes Encoder does not use PNS... but could be any other reason as well.

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #13
Hhmm... I see.

Well, considering there is a new Apple AAC codec coming with OS X Leopard and native FLAC support, who knows what else they'll change in the audio department. 

I am more or less expecting HE-AAC, at least for streaming playback, since iTunes is starting to lose out on more and more radio stations by not supporting it.
Every night with my star friends / We eat caviar and drink champagne
Sniffing in the VIP area / We talk about Frank Sinatra
Do you know Frank Sinatra? / He's dead

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #14
when you guys do the next test, throw an email my way. i can encode samples using AAC on my PS3... uses the 3gp container format, tho o_O

Results: 80 kbps LC AAC listening test

Reply #15
when you guys do the next test, throw an email my way. i can encode samples using AAC on my PS3... uses the 3gp container format, tho o_O


Quick Answer SONY, the psp could only playback aacs in that back when! 

 
SimplePortal 1.0.0 RC1 © 2008-2019