Can anyone confirm that downloads work only with IE?
Quote from: Sebastian Mares on 21 December, 2006, 06:42:21 AMCan anyone confirm that downloads work only with IE?If you block the google ads the download link doesn't show up.
mennoOnly LC is included to test? Is the reason that you want to see how PNS and IS perform on LC part only and not on SBR or new encoder will bring better quality with LC profile?
Can a user expect that his LC decoder (for instance the one in my Nokia 6230) makes use of PNS and/or IS?
So in short you just need the .erf files zipped then?
For most of the tests it is hard for me to determine what is an encoded sample and what is the original.What do you people think: should results where only low anchor is determined also be sent and counted as relevant data?
Quote from: muaddib on 22 December, 2006, 05:02:55 AMFor most of the tests it is hard for me to determine what is an encoded sample and what is the original.What do you people think: should results where only low anchor is determined also be sent and counted as relevant data?That would a half of problem. On some samples after to be enable to abxed them (even high anchor) it's still hard to judge wich one was slightly better than another one.
mennoCan you confirm if you received my results? Often the messages end in spam folder. Thank you.
My main problem is, in order to properly prepare myself for the "Official" ABC/HR test, I always do very very many ABX tests---and since there are so many samples being tested (7 in this case), by the time I have finished training myself on them via ABX, my ears are too fatigued to take the "official" test in an ideal fashon.Part of the issue (at least for me) is that some artifacts in some of the samples, are nearly inaudible unless listened to a bit on the loud side. So I get fatigued rather quickly.
IMO it is not important to do so much detailed ABX test.In tests conducted by ITU (for development of PEAQ) testers were asked to give scores even if they are not certain what is the original and what is a test sample. It was even desired that they don't give 5 but rather something between 4 and 5. So people sometimes judged incorrectly what is the original and what is a test. There are results in ITU tests with positive SDG (meaning that a test sample sounds better than the original).IMO it is not good to have this kind of results, but it is also better to have results with 5 than not to have any results at all. 5 is also good because it means that you can not hear the difference. So if it is hard for you to ABX simple give up and give 5