Skip to main content

Notice

Please note that most of the software linked on this forum is likely to be safe to use. If you are unsure, feel free to ask in the relevant topics, or send a private message to an administrator or moderator. To help curb the problems of false positives, or in the event that you do find actual malware, you can contribute through the article linked here.
Topic: Comparing Psytel With Fhg Aac At A Low Bitrate (Read 2001 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Comparing Psytel With Fhg Aac At A Low Bitrate

I'm finished with my comparison of the 64 kbps c't samples with different encodings of AACEnc v2.15. If some of you are interested, I can upload them to my homepage and host them for a while, because I have about 15 MB of free webspace at the moment. But this means I have to choose which ones would make sense and/or include those that interest you most. I would suggest to pack at least the reference.wav, FhG AAC, PsyTEL, WMA9 and mp3PRO into one huge SFX-RAR archive and rename them, so that you won't know which is which. If you would prefer another procedure, just let me know.
ZZee ya, Hans-Jürgen
BLUEZZ BASTARDZZ - "That lil' ol' ZZ Top cover band from Hamburg..."
INDIGO ROCKS - "Down home rockin' blues. Tasty as strudel."