Skip to main content

Topic: LAME 3.97b2 (Read 48138 times) previous topic - next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
  • xmixahlx
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #25
Quote
Hi,
Is there a apt-key signature key for your debian RareWare repositories. I'm using sid and I can just use --allow-unauthenticated with apt-get but I like to use aptitude and it just looks ugly   with all those U's splattered all over the place.
thanks
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=345770"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

no. i don't develop/package with a key yet (so, none is available for the repo).  It isn't a high priority, either.

(...oh, i'll get to 3.97b2 when i get home from work, btw)


later
  • Last Edit: 28 November, 2005, 04:42:07 PM by xmixahlx

  • Madrigal
  • [*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #26
Quote
I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=345890"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
It's unclear to me, has this been done now ?

EDIT: I'm not quite sure how to go about checking for announcement of the beta 2 version at Sourceforge, is there a link ?

Regards,
Madrigal
  • Last Edit: 29 November, 2005, 09:38:23 AM by Madrigal

  • john33
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #27
Quote
Quote
I will post a 'final' beta, plus derivative compiles, once the beta 2 version is announced at Sourceforge. Only then can we be sure that we have the full beta 2 release.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=345890"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
It's unclear to me, has this been done now ?

EDIT: I'm not quite sure how to go about checking for announcement of the beta 2 version at Sourceforge, is there a link ?

Regards,
Madrigal
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346261"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

All the beta 2 compiles now at Rarewares are the final beta 2 versions.
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/

  • Madrigal
  • [*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #28
Quote
All the beta 2 compiles now at Rarewares are the final beta 2 versions.
Thank you. 

Regards,
Madrigal

  • Synthetic Soul
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #29
Thanks John.

NB: lamedropXPd says it is using beta 1.  Edit: On Encoding Options dialogue.

I like the spinning LAME logo.
  • Last Edit: 29 November, 2005, 10:12:54 AM by Synthetic Soul
I'm on a horse.

  • john33
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #30
Quote
Thanks John.

NB: lamedropXPd says it is using beta 1.  Edit: On Encoding Options dialogue.

Oh b*gg*r!! OK, I've fixed that and uploaded again. It was only the narrative, it was using the correct libs. BTW, thanks for letting me know. 
Quote
I like the spinning LAME logo.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346268"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/

  • DARcode
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Members (Donating)
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #31
Thanks a bunch, john33! Appreciated.
WavPack 4.75.2 -b384hx6cmv/qaac 2.55 -V 100

  • jamesbaud
  • [*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #32
Quote
Thanks a bunch, john33! Appreciated.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346311"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Same here! Thx to the LAME devs also!

  • indybrett
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Members (Donating)
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #33
...and I just finished encoding 11,000+ songs with B1, lol.  Glad I have them all FLAC'd.
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro

  • ChiGung
  • [*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #34
note: Theres only a point in re-encoding if they're at preset fast medium or insane. Not an urgent need to do so even if so.
  • Last Edit: 30 November, 2005, 12:55:17 AM by ChiGung
no conscience > no custom

  • indybrett
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Members (Donating)
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #35
-V 2 --vbr-new -Y

That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-)
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro

  • jaybeee
  • [*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #36
Quote
insane. [a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346434"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

te he - now that's a sneaky little link in the 'i' isn't it

  • Analog
  • [*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #37
lamedropXPd writes comment field: Encoded using LAME-3.97b1 in tag.
  • Last Edit: 30 November, 2005, 11:03:41 AM by Analog

  • Vivadavid
  • [*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #38
Quote
-V 2 --vbr-new -Y

That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-)
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346435"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Sorry, but what is -Y for?

  • indybrett
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Members (Donating)
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #39
Quote
Quote
-V 2 --vbr-new -Y

That's what I use, so I probably won't re-encode for awhile ;-)
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346435"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Sorry, but what is -Y for?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346576"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Disables SFB21, so nothing above 16khz is encoded.  Personal preference, because I can't hear that high anyway, and it reduces filesize.

Edit:  yes, i know about preset medium 
  • Last Edit: 30 November, 2005, 11:18:18 AM by indybrett
flac>fb2k>kernel streaming>audiophile 2496>magni>dt990 pro

  • ChiGung
  • [*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #40
Quote
te he - now that's a sneaky little link in the 'i' isn't it

  -must be a bug in the forum software hawkeye...
no conscience > no custom

  • john33
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #41
Quote
lamedropXPd writes comment field: Encoded using LAME-3.97b1 in tag.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=346572"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

And, again - b*gg*r!! I think I'll simply remove that tag - it's not exactly necessary. Thanks for the notification.  I'll upload again a little later.
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/

  • BinaryTB
  • [*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #42
Quote
lame.exe fixed for .mp2 and mp3 decoding: lame.exe only (ICL4.5). For mp3 and mp2 decoding, this now yields the same output as foobar2000 but the error checking remains unchanged.
2005-11-29

That's for 3.97b2.  3.97b1 had a fixed exe as well from what I remember and 3.96.1.

Why have a fixed exe for decoding separately for each version?  Can't the fixes be included in the regular versions?

  • john33
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Developer
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #43
Quote
Quote
lame.exe fixed for .mp2 and mp3 decoding: lame.exe only (ICL4.5). For mp3 and mp2 decoding, this now yields the same output as foobar2000 but the error checking remains unchanged.
2005-11-29

That's for 3.97b2.  3.97b1 had a fixed exe as well from what I remember and 3.96.1.

Why have a fixed exe for decoding separately for each version?  Can't the fixes be included in the regular versions?
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=347323"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

The necessary changes have now been merged into the latest 3.98alpha so there will be no more 'fixed' versions after the 3.97 ones.
John
----------------------------------------------------------------
My compiles and utilities are at http://www.rarewares.org/

  • Alex B
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #44
Quote
          o ReplayGain analysis should now be faster when encountering silent parts

Maybe related, but awhile ago I created a silent sound file in soundforge and encoded it with: mppenc, LAME, and Nero AAC.
I noticed that LAME took approximately 7x longer to encode pure silence than the others. I thought it was a little strange.[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

This has obviously changed. Analyzing silent parts is much faster now. I tested the behavior in this thread: [a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=39198]http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index....showtopic=39198[/url].

  • Alex B
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #45
I just noticed this.

"Your file doesn't exist, or you didn't select one."

The Win32 and LameDrop XPd download links at the recommended LAME compiles Wiki page are broken:

List of recommended LAME compiles

http://wiki.hydrogenaudio.org/index.php?title=Lame_Compiles

  • huh-hah
  • [*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #46
3.98a2 (up at Rarewares); is it safe?

  • larswes
  • [*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #47
Quote
3.98a2 (up at Rarewares); is it safe?
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

From [a href="http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28125]This sticky thread:[/url]
Lame alphas are ONLY for testing. Do NOT use Lame alphas unless you want to test it and maybe provide feedback.

  • huh-hah
  • [*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #48
Quote
From This sticky thread:
Lame alphas are ONLY for testing. Do NOT use Lame alphas unless you want to test it and maybe provide feedback.
[a href="index.php?act=findpost&pid=348287"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]



thanks. yes, i know it says that. i'm still curious if anyone has had any problems running it.

  • stephanV
  • [*][*][*][*]
LAME 3.97b2
Reply #49
Maybe you can tell us your experiences in the meanwhile?
  • Last Edit: 07 December, 2005, 06:56:54 AM by stephanV
"We cannot win against obsession. They care, we don't. They win."