-rating -rating 1 or greater -rating 2 or greater -rating 3 or greater -rating 4 or greater -rating 5
i don't think it's very likely but who knowsyou can assign one view to active playlist and other to filter result for browsing, but you probably know thatthe dual playlist view implementation is somehow not very easy to accomodateat least i don't think ELplaylist way is the best one because this way was accomplished with single column playlist view component even earlieri posted earlier that in dual or even more views it would be easier if active playlist view is reflected by current focused window i.e. if i click on item in playlist view A that playlist should became active playlist, and then if i click in other playlist view B or C or whatever than that playlist should became active.this way i think we can avoid unwanted playlist interaction betwen different views
there is option in filter settings, behaviour > sort incoming...in other circumstances it can be adjusted in: preferences > global > sort incoming...
I want to make a custom rating filter that shows: rating 1 or greaterrating 2 or greaterrating 3 or greaterrating 4 or greaterrating 5I'm brooding over it for some time now (tried several $ifgreater formats), but I can't come up with anything that works. Anybody able to help?
Quote from: Hakubo on 29 March, 2009, 06:11:57 AMWhich leaves the second-or-so delay from Filter. It is this long only when the "All" nodes are chosen in the top two filters, and theming does nothing to change it. I've checked again (it seems last time I was checking with some genre selected in Facets), with the same conditions, Facets updates 2-3 times faster, so there probably is some room for optimization, I hope.I can probably do some things here, I'll have a look, thanks
Which leaves the second-or-so delay from Filter. It is this long only when the "All" nodes are chosen in the top two filters, and theming does nothing to change it. I've checked again (it seems last time I was checking with some genre selected in Facets), with the same conditions, Facets updates 2-3 times faster, so there probably is some room for optimization, I hope.
0.3.6.8 released. Mainly various bug fixes.
What's your grouping code? Seems to me that it causes the problem... aside from possible tagging inconsistencies. e.g. why don't you use DISCNUMBER??? ...and your "correct sorted" screenshot has no correct order of tracknumbers
Try the new build; it should generally be much faster at updating, except when you have a search query active. And it could probably do with a thrashing to make sure I didn't break anything.
Yes, well, I'm pretty much a foobar2000 noob, so the incorrect track number ordering I can live with...However the splitting of the Led Zeppelin Physical Graffiti discs like that is just a space waster.I use a tagging program to tag my music, so I don't want to mess about with the tags myself. Is there a way I can just make foobar2000 treat it each disc as a seperate album, like it does for everything else?Also: feel free to tell me how to fix the tracknumber order too!
for example RATING 4 OR GREATER:Code: [Select]$if($or($strcmp(%rating%,4),$strcmp(%rating%,5)),%rating%,)you have to repeat that inside $or for those other filters... cannot think of a method to shorten it.callisto